I Cartan's Understanding of Einstein Field Equation

dx
Homework Helper
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
52
TL;DR Summary
Cartan and general relativity
About a week ago I was reading about Cartan's geometric interpretation of the Einstein Field Equation

Gij + Λgij = κTij

According to Cartan, this equation expresses the idea

(sum of moments of rotation for the faces of a little 3-cube) = 8π * (amount of energy-momentum within that 3-cube)

As far as I can tell, it is only in John Wheeler's various books (MTW, but also his other books) where this idea of Cartan is explained. None of the other popular books like Wald discuss this. Apparently, it was Wheeler who dug it out of Cartan's papers and made it widely known. If anyone on this forum has a good understanding of this, I would appreciate it if you can share/explain this. Also, why don't more people and books adopt this viewpoint? Is it because Cartan's coordinate free differential geometry is too sophisticated?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Frankly I don't know why...Btw MTW has also a section for the Cartan's geometric interpretation of Newton spacetime (basically the Poisson equation).
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top