I Ceiling fan pressure increase or decrease

AI Thread Summary
A ceiling fan does not significantly alter air pressure in a room, as it primarily creates internal airflow. The pressure around the fan decreases before it and increases afterward, but these changes are minimal and average out across the room. In a typical room connected to the exterior, pressure remains stable due to equalization with the outside atmosphere. However, in a hermetically sealed and insulated space, a fan could raise the internal temperature, causing air expansion and an increase in pressure. Overall, the impact of a ceiling fan on air pressure is negligible in most scenarios.
singhsshub
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Would air pressure increase or decrease due to a ceiling fan in a room?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither, this is internal flow. The pressure directly around the fan will decrease (before the fan) and increase (after the fan) somewhat, this pressure smears out to miniscule amounts in other parts of the room. But on average the pressure stays the same.

Also, the room is usually connected to the exterior atmosphere, which equalizes the pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Chestermiller, Bystander and 2 others
singhsshub said:
Would air pressure increase or decrease due to a ceiling fan in a room?
If the room was a hermetically sealed box, with an internal fan, then the internal air would be warmed by the turbulence generated by the fan. The warmer air would expand, so pressure would increase.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Arjan82
Not just hermetically sealed, but also perfectly insulated, but yeah, nicely found :)
 
Arjan82 said:
Not just hermetically sealed, but also perfectly insulated, but yeah, nicely found :)
It wouldn't need to be perfectly insulated. Certainly that would maximize the effect, but a regular closed room could still be heated sufficiently to cause the expansion effect temporarily. Lots of typical home appliances can produce sufficient heat to raise the temp of a closed room noticeably.
 
  • Like
Likes Baluncore and Arjan82
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top