MHB Challenge problem #2 Show that 5φ^2n+4(−1)^n is a perfect square

  • Thread starter Thread starter Olinguito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Square
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the expression 5φ²n + 4(-1)ⁿ is a perfect square for all non-negative integers n, using properties of the Fibonacci sequence defined by φ₀ = 0 and φ₁ = 1. The proof employs matrix representation and induction, showing that the determinant of the Fibonacci matrix leads to the relationship φₙ₋₁φₙ₊₁ - φₙ² = (-1)ⁿ. By manipulating the expressions, it is demonstrated that 5φ²n + 4(-1)ⁿ can be rewritten as a square of an integer, specifically (φₙ + 2φₙ₋₁)². The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the solution's elegance and invites further contributions.
Olinguito
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Define a Fibonacci sequence by
$$\varphi_0=0,\,\varphi_1=1;\ \varphi_{n+2}=\varphi_{n+1}+\varphi_n\ \forall \,n\in\mathbb Z^+\cup\{0\}.$$
Show that
$$5\varphi_n^2+4(-1)^n$$
is a perfect square for all non-negative integers $n$.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Olinguito said:
Define a Fibonacci sequence by
$$\varphi_0=0,\,\varphi_1=1;\ \varphi_{n+2}=\varphi_{n+1}+\varphi_n\ \forall \,n\in\mathbb Z^+\cup\{0\}.$$
Show that
$$5\varphi_n^2+4(-1)^n$$
is a perfect square for all non-negative integers $n$.
[sp]Let $A = \begin{bmatrix}0&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_0&\varphi_1\\ \varphi_1&\varphi_2\end{bmatrix}$. By induction, $A^n = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n-1}&\varphi_n\\ \varphi_n&\varphi_{n+1}\end{bmatrix}$. The inductive step is given by the calculation $$A^{n+1} = A^nA = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n-1}&\varphi_n\\ \varphi_n&\varphi_{n+1}\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}0&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n}&\varphi_{n-1} + \varphi_n\\ \varphi_{n+1}&\varphi_{n}+\varphi_{n+1}\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n}&\varphi_{n+1}\\ \varphi_{n+1}&\varphi_{n+2}\end{bmatrix}.$$ Since $\det A = -1$, it follows that $\det A^n = (-1)^n$. Therefore $\varphi_{n-1}\varphi_{n+1} - \varphi_{n}^2 = (-1)^n$. Then $$ \varphi_{n}^2 + (-1)^n = \varphi_{n-1}\varphi_{n+1} = \varphi_{n-1}(\varphi_{n} + \varphi_{n-1}) = \varphi_{n}\varphi_{n-1} + \varphi_{n-1}^2,$$ $$4\varphi_{n}^2 + 4(-1)^n = 4\varphi_{n}\varphi_{n-1} + 4\varphi_{n-1}^2, $$ $$5\varphi_{n}^2 + 4(-1)^n = \varphi_{n}^2 + 4\varphi_{n}\varphi_{n-1} + 4\varphi_{n-1}^2 = (\varphi_{n} + 2\varphi_{n-1})^2, $$ which is a perfect square since $\psi_{n} = \varphi_{n} + 2\varphi_{n-1}$ is an integer.

(The numbers $\psi_n$ are the Lucas numbers.)[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Let $A = \begin{bmatrix}0&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_0&\varphi_1\\ \varphi_1&\varphi_2\end{bmatrix}$. By induction, $A^n = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n-1}&\varphi_n\\ \varphi_n&\varphi_{n+1}\end{bmatrix}$. The inductive step is given by the calculation $$A^{n+1} = A^nA = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n-1}&\varphi_n\\ \varphi_n&\varphi_{n+1}\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}0&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n}&\varphi_{n-1} + \varphi_n\\ \varphi_{n+1}&\varphi_{n}+\varphi_{n+1}\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\varphi_{n}&\varphi_{n+1}\\ \varphi_{n+1}&\varphi_{n+2}\end{bmatrix}.$$ Since $\det A = -1$, it follows that $\det A^n = (-1)^n$. Therefore $\varphi_{n-1}\varphi_{n+1} - \varphi_{n}^2 = (-1)^n$. Then $$ \varphi_{n}^2 + (-1)^n = \varphi_{n-1}\varphi_{n+1} = \varphi_{n-1}(\varphi_{n} + \varphi_{n-1}) = \varphi_{n}\varphi_{n-1} + \varphi_{n-1}^2,$$ $$4\varphi_{n}^2 + 4(-1)^n = 4\varphi_{n}\varphi_{n-1} + 4\varphi_{n-1}^2, $$ $$5\varphi_{n}^2 + 4(-1)^n = \varphi_{n}^2 + 4\varphi_{n}\varphi_{n-1} + 4\varphi_{n-1}^2 = (\varphi_{n} + 2\varphi_{n-1})^2, $$ which is a perfect square since $\psi_{n} = \varphi_{n} + 2\varphi_{n-1}$ is an integer.

(The numbers $\psi_n$ are the Lucas numbers.)[/sp]
Excellent solution! (Clapping) My own solution is much more mundane by comparison; I’ll wait and see if anyone else wants to try the problem before posting it.
 
Here’s my own solution to the challenge problem.
We shall prove by induction that the Fibonacci numbers satisfy the following equation:
$$\varphi_{n+1}^2-\varphi_n\varphi_{n+1}-\varphi_n^2-(-1)^n\ =\ 0.$$
It is easily checked that the equation is satisfied for $n=0$. Assume it is true for some integer $n\geqslant0$. Rewriting $\varphi_n=\varphi_{n+2}-\varphi_{n+1}$ gives
$$\varphi_{n+1}^2-(\varphi_{n+2}-\varphi_{n+1})\varphi_{n+1}-(\varphi_{n+2}-\varphi_{n+1})^2-(-1)^n\ =\ 0$$
which on simplifying becomes
$$-\varphi_{n+2}^2+\varphi_{n+1}\varphi_{n+2}+\varphi_{n+1}^2-(-1)^n\ =\ 0$$
– i.e.
$$\varphi_{n+2}^2-\varphi_{n+1}\varphi_{n+2}-\varphi_{n+1}^2-(-1)^{n+1}\ =\ 0.$$
QED. Hence: each Fibonacci number $\varphi_{n+1}$, an integer, is a root of the quadratic
$$x^2-\varphi_nx-\varphi_n^2-(-1)^n\ =\ 0$$
which has integer coefficients. Therefore its discriminant must be a perfect square. And the discriminant is
$$(-\varphi_n)^2-4\left[-\varphi_n^2-(-1)^n\right]$$
– that is to say:
$$5\varphi_n^2+4(-1)^n.$$
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top