MHB Change of variables/ Transformations

Joe20
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
I have obtained as such using changing of variables/ transformations:

Let u= y/x and v= xy after manipulating the equation of the curves as such xy = 5, xy = 2, y/x = 1 and y/x = 4.
Then u = 1, u = 4, v = 5 and v = 2 => obtain a square on the u-v plane.

Change the integrand to:

Outer integral: 2 to 5
inner integral: 1 to 4
replace the expression for y/x to u [ u cos (u\pi) du dv]

I am not sure if I have done it correctly thus far. If so, how do i integrate that expression? Need advice.
 

Attachments

  • ca1.png
    ca1.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 102
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexis87 said:
I have obtained as such using changing of variables/ transformations:

Let u= y/x and v= xy after manipulating the equation of the curves as such xy = 5, xy = 2, y/x = 1 and y/x = 4.
Then u = 1, u = 4, v = 5 and v = 2 => obtain a square on the u-v plane.

Change the integrand to:

Outer integral: 2 to 5
inner integral: 1 to 4
replace the expression for y/x to u [ u cos (u\pi) du dv]

I am not sure if I have done it correctly thus far. If so, how do i integrate that expression? Need advice.

Seems to me you'll be needing the Jacobian in your new integral. I'm hoping this isn't the first you've heard of it.
 
tkhunny said:
Seems to me you'll be needing the Jacobian in your new integral. I'm hoping this isn't the first you've heard of it.
Hi Yes I will need to multiply by the jacobian value which I have missed out. (anyway that suppose to be a constant). Would like to know how should I integrate such expression from what I have stated.
 
Alexis87 said:
Hi Yes I will need to multiply by the jacobian value which I have missed out. (anyway that suppose to be a constant). Would like to know how should I integrate such expression from what I have stated.

No objection to anything else I see. You had better PROVE that it's a constant.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Back
Top