Changing temperature of falling bodies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the temperature change of a block of material falling from a height and the relationship between potential energy, kinetic energy, and heat energy. The key equation used is mgh = deltaQ + 0.5mv^2, which illustrates the conservation of energy principle. The confusion arises from interpreting the energy transformations and whether both options (a) and (b) are correct regarding temperature change. Ultimately, it is clarified that the potential energy converts to kinetic energy upon impact, which then transforms into heat energy, resulting in a temperature change. The participants reach an understanding that energy conservation implies a temperature increase rather than no change.
djk628
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of material of mass m and specific heat c falls from height h and reaches speed v just before striking the ground. Its temperature is measured immediately after it strikes the ground. If we ignore any change in temperature owing to interaction with the air, the change in temperature of the block of material is

a. v2/2c
b. gh/c
c. vgh/c
d. All of the answers above are correct.
e. Only (a) and (b) above are correct

Homework Equations



mgh = deltaQ + .5mv2

Q = mcT

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm confused because by my understanding, the answer should be (gh-(v2/2))/c which is a combination of both A and B. However, this does not mean that both A and B are correct as answer choice E states. I obtained this answer by simply isolating T in the aforementioned relative equation. Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the block is at height h it has potential energy mgh and kinetic energy 0. Just as it hits the ground it has kinetic energy (1/2)*mv^2 and potential energy 0. Conservation of energy says KE+PE is constant. That means (1/2)*mv^2=mgh. Your answer would give 0. Do you see why both a) and b) are correct now?
 
Ah, i must have read the question too quickly. Earlier in the homework assignment there was a question that involved an object reaching terminal velocity and then continued falling, allowing for further temperature change. I assumed it had the same conditions as the earlier problem. Thanks!
 
I am slightly confused on one thing though... Since KE = PE, then wouldn't deltaQ be zero, so there wouldn't be any temperature change at all?
 
What actually happens here is PE (mgh) at the top of the fall get changed into an equal amount of KE (mv^2/2) at the impact which then gets changed into an equal amount of heat energy (Q) conserving energy all the way. They are all EQUAL. How would that translate into 'no temperature change'??
 
Alright I understand it now. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top