Charged parallel plates, proton and electron released simultaneously

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two parallel plates with opposite charges, where a proton and an electron are released simultaneously. The user initially attempts to solve the problem using energy conservation and kinematic equations but encounters difficulties. They later clarify their approach by calculating the accelerations of both particles and setting up equations for their respective distances traveled. The conclusion emphasizes that the proton's greater mass results in it moving much slower than the electron, confirming their mathematical findings. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between mass, acceleration, and motion in electric fields.
dewert
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Charged parallel plates, proton and electron released simultaneously

Homework Statement



Two parallel plates 0.700 cm apart are equally and oppositely charged. An electron is released from rest at the surface of the negative plate and simultaneously a proton is released from rest at the surface of the positive plate. How far from the negative plate is the point at which the electron and proton pass each other?


Homework Equations



U = qEs
v^2 = (v_0)^2 + 2ad
a = qE/m
*Taking q to mean +1.60E-19 ie. charge of proton

The Attempt at a Solution



Attempt to use energy for entire system:

Define s-axis as running from negative plate on left to positive plate on right.

U_i = U_f + K_f

qE*s_p_i (for proton) - qE*s_e_i (for electron, =0) = -qEs_e + qEs_p + (1/2)m_p*(v_p)^2 + (1/2)m_e*(v_e)^2

Subbed in qE/m for a in v^2 = 2ad (v_0 = 0) to get (1/2)(2*qE/m_p*(7E-3-s_e)) for proton, (1/2)(2*qE/m_e*(s_e)) for electron.

Solved all of this for s (E's and q's cancelling all over the place) and got something... wrong. I was trying a lot of other stuff before, involving x = x_0 + v_0*t + 1/2*at^2, but it ended up in tautologies... sigh. Can anyone help, by at least telling me if I'm on the right track at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would solve it like this:

Find acceleration of electron (a_{e})


a_{e}=\frac{eE}{m_{e}}




Find acceleration of proton (a_{p})




Apply S_{e}=\frac{a_{e}t^2}{2}......(1)



and S_{p}=\frac{a_{p}t^2}{2}.......(2)


Eliminate 't' from equation 1 and 2 to get eq(3).


S_{e}+S_{p}=0.007....(4)



solve (3) and (4) to get S_{e}.


_______________________________
I may be wrong...
 
Thanks google_spider!

Ah... lovely. And so easy! I swear I would have thought of it eventually :P

It makes sense, because the proton is several orders of magnitude more massive than the electron. No way it would move nearly as fast. Should've thought of that one right off the bat. Good to have mathematical proof though.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top