Charging and discharging a battery at the same time

  • Thread starter Thread starter CWatters
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Charging and discharging a battery simultaneously is a common misconception, particularly among laptop users. In reality, when a device is plugged in, the charger powers the processor, and the battery is charged only if the load is less than the charger's capacity. If the load exceeds this capacity, the battery supplies the excess power, but it is still not charging and discharging at the same time. Current can only flow in one direction down a wire at any given moment, making true simultaneous charging and discharging impossible. However, in complex systems with multiple cells, some cells may charge while others remain static or discharge, but this does not change the fundamental principle for individual cells.
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
10,546
Reaction score
2,324
Is it me or...

I was surprised to discover quite a few people think it's possible to charge and discharge a battery at exactly the same time. For example laptop users think the battery is simultaneously being charged by a charger and discharged by the processor at the same time. In reality the charger is powering the processor in this situation, the battery is only being charged. At least it is when the processor load is less than the charger capacity. If the load briefly exceeds the charger capacity the battery supplies the excess. But even then its only ever being charged or discharged never both at exactly the same time. Its not actually possible to charge and discharge a battery at exactly the same time because current cannot go both ways down a wire at the same time.

... unless of course I'm missing something ?
 
  • Informative
Likes DaveC426913
Engineering news on Phys.org
CWatters said:
... unless of course I'm missing something ?
You are technically correct, but for the complexity that, since a "battery of cells" can have a Battery Management Controller, some cells may be charging, while others are static, or discharging.

Anyhow, your statement is probably true for any single cell.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta Prime and berkeman
CWatters said:
because current cannot go both ways down a wire at the same time.
Exactly. At any instant, the current into the + terminal can either be flowing in or out. However, there is another important issue of 'management' and that is the Energy flow over a given time. A motor car battery is being charged ('top-up') when the engine is running at sufficient speed and sometimes discharged at low speeds. So the battery capacity (AmpHours) becomes relevant, to see you through all situations.
Same with a laptop computer. Current from the mains power supply will feed the computer's circuits and also charge the battery if needed.
Batteries may be used to 'stabilise' the voltage of a supply to isolate the load from supply voltage fluctuations or drop-outs.

But battery current is only ever flowing one way.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top