Checking if Point Lies on Nurbs Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter sundar0206
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Point
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a point lies on a NURBS surface, one must check if the point satisfies the rational function description of any of the surface's patches, considering their limits. This process can be complex and requires an understanding of how NURBS surfaces are mathematically represented. A solid grasp of the equations describing the surface is essential for accurate evaluation. It is recommended to research NURBS for a better understanding of their structure and properties. Gaining this knowledge will facilitate the process of checking point inclusion on a NURBS surface.
sundar0206
9
0
Just had a simple question. but jus wanted to know if it had a simple answer...
Is there any way to know if a given point lies on a nurbs surface .?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, but it might require a bit of work. A nurbs surface consists of a collection of patches, each of which has a rational function description. You need to check if the point satisfies the description for any patch, taking into account the patch limits.
 
How is this done actually? Sorry I am not too well versed so can you please explain

Regards
 
sundar0206 said:
How is this done actually? Sorry I am not too well versed so can you please explain

Regards

To help you I need to know precisely your understanding of how a nurbs surface is represented. In other words what is the form of the equations describing the surface.

I suggest you look up nurbs (via google or bing) to get some idea.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top