Chemical Kinetics: Understanding the Reaction of A & B

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the reaction kinetics of substances A and B, noting that a decrease of 0.03 M in A should correspond to a 0.05 M concentration of B. The calculated rate constant k is 14.87 l/(mol*h), leading to a half-life (t1/2) of 1.34 hours for A, which appears inconsistent since more than 50% of A reacted in one hour. Participants clarify that the relationship between rate constant and half-life applies only when concentrations of A and B are equal. The final resolution indicates that a revised half-life of 0.756 hours for A aligns better with the observed reaction dynamics.
krootox217
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The task is the following:
e6rlc6W.jpg


If the concentration of A decreases 0.03 M in one hour, then the concentration of B should to, which means, [ B] should be 0.05 M?

And if I try to calculate k, i get 14.87 l/(mol*h)

For second order reactions, t1/2 sould be 1/(k*[A]0)

So I get 1.34 h as t1/2 for substance A, which somehow doesn't make sence, since more than 50% of the substance reacted in one hour. For B i get 9.29h, which doesn't make sense too. Can me someone tell my mistake?

Homework Equations


see above

The Attempt at a Solution


see above
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
krootox217 said:

Homework Statement


The task is the following:
e6rlc6W.jpg


If the concentration of A decreases 0.03 M in one hour, then the concentration of B should to, which means, [ B] should be 0.05 M?

And if I try to calculate k, i get 14.87 l/(mol*h)

For second order reactions, t1/2 sould be 1/(k*[A]0)

So I get 1.34 h as t1/2 for substance A, which somehow doesn't make sence, since more than 50% of the substance reacted in one hour. For B i get 9.29h, which doesn't make sense too. Can me someone tell my mistake?

Homework Equations


see above

The Attempt at a Solution


see above

If the concentration of A decreases 0.03 M in one hour, then the concentration of B should to, which means, [ B] should be 0.05 M? YES

I calculated the same rate constant as you.

Always good to check for reasonableness.

However I think that the simple relation of rate constant to half life only applies for the case of equal concentrations [A] = [ B]. ?

I am not sure there is any useful simple relation like that when these two are not equal. So I think you will have to work out each case using the full integrated rate equation, e.g. With [A]/[A0] = ½ and [ B] = [ B0] - [A0]/2 etc.
 
Ok, thanks for the answer, I found a way, where t1/2 for A yields 0.756h, which seems to make sence, at least for this reaction :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Thread 'How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)'
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW. Here is what I did to try to solve it The table cited in the problem is below We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given. The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22. Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode. Electrons...
Back
Top