Chemical Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conversion of chemical potential energy in gasoline to kinetic energy in a car accelerating from 0 mph to 64 mph. It emphasizes using the kinetic energy formula, KE = 1/2mv^2, to determine the energy required for different speed increments. The energy needed to accelerate from 32 mph to 64 mph is calculated to be three times greater than that required to accelerate from 0 mph to 32 mph. The conclusion drawn is that the energy required for the latter speed increase is three times as much, based on the calculations provided. Understanding the relationship between kinetic energy and chemical potential energy is crucial for solving such problems.
pewpew23
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The chemical potential energy in a certain amount of gasoline is converted to kinetic energy in a car that increased its speed from 0 mph to 32 mph. The car accelerated to 64 mph. Compared to the energy required to go from 0 to 32 mph, the energy required to go from 32 mph to 64 mph is

(A) half as much
(B) as much
(C) twice as much
(D) three times as much
(E) four times as much

Homework Equations



KE = 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Is there any equation for chemical potential energy?
I don't know what to do with just the KE equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The chemical potential energy in this question is a red herring. All you need is the kinetic energy. If you need twice as much kinetic energy, then you need twice as much chemical potential energy, it's a 1-1 correspondence (at least for simple problems like this, other factors such as engine efficiency at different temperatures are too complicated for this).
 
so going from 0 to 64 would require twice as much kinetic and chemical potential energy as going from 0 to 32?

and going to 0 to 32 would require the same amount as going to 32 to 64?
 
No, use your formula. KE=1/2mv^2

KE final - KE initial = energy required
 
1/2m(32)^2 - 1/2(0)^2 = 512m

1/2m(64)^2 - 512m = 1536m

512m/1536 = 3 times as much
 
Yea, looks good to me, except energy is expressed in J=joules not meters. =)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top