MHB Cilian's question at Yahoo Answers regarding integration by partial fractions

AI Thread Summary
The integral of the function (19x^2 - x + 4) / (x(1 + 4x^2)) is evaluated using partial fractions. The decomposition is expressed as A/x + (Bx + C)/(1 + 4x^2), leading to a system of equations to solve for A, B, and C. The resulting integrals are computed as 4ln|x|, (3/8)ln(1 + 4x^2), and (1/2)arctan(2x). Combining these results gives the final answer: 4ln|x| + (3/8)ln(1 + 4x^2) - (1/2)arctan(2x) + C. This method effectively demonstrates the application of integration by partial fractions.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Cilian said:
Find the integral
\[\int\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)}\]

Here is a link to the question:

Integral of ((19x^2)-x+4)/(x(1+4(x^2)))? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Cilian,

We're going to use partial fractions to evaluate this integral. With that said, we note that the partial fraction decomposition will take on the form

\[\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)} = \frac{A}{x}+\frac{Bx+C}{1+4x^2}\]

Multiplying both sides by the common denominator yields

\[19x^2-x+4 = A(1+4x^2) + (Bx+C)x\]

We now simplify the right hand side and group like terms to get

\[19x^2-x+4 = (4A+B)x^2+Cx+A\]

If we now compare the coefficients of both sides, we have the following system of equations:

\[\left\{\begin{aligned} 4A + B &= 19 \\ C &= -1 \\ A &= 4 \end{aligned}\right.\]

Luckily for us, we already have two of the solutions, so it follows now that $4(4)+B = 19 \implies B=3$. Therefore, we now see that

\[\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)} = \frac{4}{x} + \frac{3x-1}{1+4x^2}\]

Hence, we now see that

\[\int \frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)}\,dx = \int\frac{4}{x}\,dx + \int\frac{3x-1}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \color{red}{\int\frac{4}{x}\,dx} + \color{blue}{\int\frac{3x}{1+4x^2}\,dx} - \color{green}{\int\frac{1}{1+4x^2}\,dx}\]

The first integral is rather straightforward; you should see that

\[\int\frac{4}{x}\,dx = \color{red}{4\ln|x|+C}\]

Next, for the second integral, we make a substitution: $u=1+4x^2\implies \,du =8x\,dx \implies \dfrac{du}{8}=x\,dx$. Thus,

\[\int\frac{3x}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \frac{3}{8}\int\frac{1}{u}\,du = \frac{3}{8}\ln|u|+C = \color{blue}{\frac{3}{8}\ln(1+4x^2)+C}\]

(Note here that we can drop absolute values since $1+4x^2>0$ for any $x$.)

For the last integral, we need to note that

\[\int\frac{1}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \int\frac{1}{1+(2x)^2}\,dx\]

To integrate, we make the substitution $u=2x\implies \,du = 2\,dx \implies \dfrac{du}{2}=\,dx$. Thus,

\[\int\frac{1}{1+4x^2}\,dx = \frac{1}{2}\int\frac{1}{1+u^2}\,du = \frac{1}{2}\arctan(u)+C = \color{green}{\frac{1}{2}\arctan(2x)+C}\]

Therefore, putting everything together, we have that

\[\int\frac{19x^2-x+4}{x(1+4x^2)}\,dx = 4\ln|x| + \frac{3}{8}\ln(1+4x^2) - \frac{1}{2}\arctan(2x) + C\]

I hope this makes sense!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top