Circular Motion with static friction of race car

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the circular motion of Formula 1 cars, participants analyze why drivers do not take the shortest path through a curve. The key point is that while the blue path is shorter, the red path allows for higher speeds due to the effects of static friction, resulting in a shorter travel time. Calculations show maximum speeds for the red and blue paths as 19.3 m/s and 10.8 m/s, respectively. A critical error in initial calculations involved misjudging the distance of the blue path, which includes additional straight sections. Ultimately, the red path proves to be quicker despite its longer distance.
hannam
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Formula 1 race, the cars approach curves
from the outside, cut through to the inside, and
then drift again to the outside (red path AA’ in the
figure). However, the blue path (BB’) in the figure
is shorter. Then why do not the drivers follow the
shortest path? Give answer to this question by
proving that tred (time to travel red path) is shorter
than tblue (time to travel blue path). Only given
values are RA = 32 m and RB = 10 m, and static
friction coefficient of the road is
μs =1.2. Assume
cars make motion with constant speed throughout
the path.
Important: The speeds of the cars do not change
due to static or kinetic frictions. However, only
static friction acts to the car as a centripetal force when the car makes a circular motion.
Therefore, first find maximum possible speed of a car while making a circular motion.


Homework Equations


m.g.μs=m.V2/r
T= 2∏r/V

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried m.g.μs=m.V2/r equation and found V max values for both cars (19,3 for the car on the red path and 10.8 for the blue path)
and then for T values i used equation 2∏r/V and found T for blue path is shorter. but in the question it wants me to prove that tred is shorter :/
i attached the picture of question.
where am i wrong? thanks for helpp!
 

Attachments

  • Ads?z.png
    Ads?z.png
    9.2 KB · Views: 557
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very interesting question, hannam. It is a treat to work on it!
I get your 19.3 and 10.8 (actually I have 19.4, maybe because I use g=9.81). But I conclude the opposite - the red path is quicker. During my calculation I first made a huge mistake, which maybe is why your calc didn't work out. I took the distance to be πr in both cases, but if you look closely at the blue path, the distance is πr PLUS TWO STRAIGHT SECTIONS. Yes, πr not 2πr because its only a half circle.
 
i didnt see the straight lines and of course its half circle so it should be πr :) yess i found it thank you so much :smile:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top