Clarification on Frictional Forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mneox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
Frictional forces arise from the interactions between a body and the surface it rests on, with static friction opposing applied forces until a limiting value is reached. The static friction force can be calculated using the equation Ff = μsN, where μs is the coefficient of static friction and N is the normal force. Once the applied force exceeds this limiting value, the body begins to move, and the frictional force transitions to kinetic friction, represented by fk = μkN. In scenarios where the body is stationary, the applied force equals the static friction force, while in motion, the net force is determined by the difference between the applied force and the kinetic friction force. Understanding when to use static versus kinetic friction is crucial for accurately calculating frictional forces in different contexts.
mneox
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am requiring some assistance in getting some clarification on frictional forces.

I know that Ff = u(Fn).

How do you generally find the frictional force though? I noticed how sometimes Ff is the same as the applied force, and sometimes you find it by using Fnet = Fa - Ff.

Why is this? And how do I know when to use which? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frictional force acts on a body due it's interactions with the surface on which it rests. So, when you apply a force on the body, there results an opposing force due to these interactions; the body being static all the while, the force is due to static friction. It is experimentally found that this force is proportional to the normal reaction acting on the body due to the the surface. Now when you go on increasing the applied force, then for a particular value of it, the frictional force reaches a limitting value,i.e, on applying further force the body will move. Thus,
fs=\musN
where fs is the force of static friction, N is the normal reaction, & \mus is the the coefficient of static friciton. \mus is defined only for the limitting value of the static frictional force, acting on the body at rest.
On applying a force greater than the limitting value of the frictional force, the body starts translating, and now the value of the frictional force reduces to smaller value. For this condition, \muk, the co-efficient of kinetic friction is defined, and the force is called the force of kinetic friction. We have,
fk=\mukN
So, when you're given the condition that the body is just about to move, force applied fa is,
fa=fs
But when the body is translating, the net force is given by,
Fnet=fa-fk
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top