Classical Energy vs Quantum Energy

eep
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
Hi,
If we find an expression for the total energy of a system in terms of classical mechanics, can we replace the observables with their quantum-mechanical operators and state that this new equation acting on the wave function should give you the energy eigenvalues? My gut reaction is to say no, because there must be some quantum mechanical effects which just simply can't be accounted for in classical mechanics, however I noticed when working on solving a rigid rotor that it is indeed the case. Moreover, isn't the Hamiltonian in QM derived by following this prescription?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eep said:
Hi,
If we find an expression for the total energy of a system in terms of classical mechanics, can we replace the observables with their quantum-mechanical operators and state that this new equation acting on the wave function should give you the energy eigenvalues? My gut reaction is to say no, because there must be some quantum mechanical effects which just simply can't be accounted for in classical mechanics, however I noticed when working on solving a rigid rotor that it is indeed the case. Moreover, isn't the Hamiltonian in QM derived by following this prescription?


I've seen some arguments about your question in the Dirac's classic QM textbook.

Any more opinions?
 
If there is a dynamical variable on classical phase space \omega(x, p) then we can make the replacement

x\rightarrow X, p \rightarrow P,

where X, P are the position and momentum operators, to get the quantum operator

\Omega(X, P).

There may be ordering ambiguities etc. which can be resolved by comparison with experiment.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
750
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top