Classical Mechanics: Canonical transformation problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the transformation defined by Q=log(1/q*sinp) and P=q*cotp is canonical. Participants analyze the necessary conditions for canonical transformations, specifically the derivatives involving Q and P. A key issue arises when the participant realizes that they incorrectly equated partial derivatives, leading to confusion in their calculations. The correct approach involves recognizing that partial derivatives do not simply invert as assumed. Ultimately, the participant clarifies their misunderstanding and successfully derives the necessary relationships.
genius2687
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show directly that the transformation; Q=log(1/q*sinp), P=q*cotp is canonical.

Homework Equations



Since these equations have no time dependence, the equations are canonical if (with d denoting a partial derivative)

dQ_i/dq_j = dp_j/dP_i, and dQ_i/dp_j = -dq_j/dP_i

The Attempt at a Solution



With

Q=log(1/q*sinp), dQ/dq = -1/q

P=q*cotp => p=tan^-1(q/P), dp/dP = -q/(p^2+q^2).

The first problem I encounter is that -1/q not= -q/(p^2+q^2).

With dQ/dp = cotp, and -dq/dP = -1/(dP/dq) = -cotp

so, cotp not= -cotp.

:mad: :mad:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It worked for me. I solved for

cosp = Pe^Q

q = sinp/e^Q = sqrt[1 - (Pe^Q)²]/e^Q

and took the derivatives.
 
I know what I did now. For partial derivatives, dx/dy not= 1/(dy/dx). I falsely made that assumption.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top