I Classical Mechanics - Motion of a particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a particle with a specific acceleration formula moves along the surface of a cone. The acceleration is defined as a constant multiplied by the cross product of the velocity vector and the position vector, normalized by the cube of the position vector's magnitude. The key to proving the motion on the cone's surface lies in showing that a constant vector exists such that its dot product with the position vector remains constant. Participants suggest that for the motion to remain confined to the cone, certain conditions must be met, particularly regarding the particle's speed and trajectory. Understanding these constraints and vector identities is crucial for grasping the motion dynamics involved.
Einstenio
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
How to find the trajectory given the acceleration as a cross product of velocity and acceleration
Show that a point with acceleration given by:
a=c*((dr/dt)×r)/|r|3
where c is a constant, moves on the surface of a cone.

This is jut an example to illustrate my doubt. I don't know how to obtain the tracjectory given only the acceleration in this format. I realized that if i can show that there is an constat vector 'a' that satisfy a•r=constant, than the motion would be on the surface of a cone. So i tried to make use of some vectorial identity multiplying by cross product on both sides and try to use the 'BAC-CAB' rule, but that didnt lead to anywhere.

Is there any example similar to this case or anywhere i can study to have a better understanding?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean ##\mathbf{r}## is confined on the surface of a cone ? If so as an obvious case bodies moving on generatrix of a cone keep constant speed. Bodies moving around circumference of bottom of a cone gets acceleration leaving the cone surface. There should be a confinement to keep them on the surface.
 
Last edited:
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top