Classical position/velocity probability

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between a particle's velocity and its probability of being found in a specific region of space, emphasizing that lower velocities correlate with higher probabilities. Two cases of particle velocity are analyzed: one oscillating symmetrically around v0 and another that oscillates around v0 with a lower bound. It is argued that the time spent at lower velocities increases the likelihood of finding the particle there. The symmetry of the cosine function is acknowledged, but it is noted that the overall velocity function's asymmetry influences the probability distribution. The conversation concludes with a clarification of how these factors interact to determine the likelihood of finding a particle at various velocities.
j1m1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Probability to find a particle in some region of space is inversely proportional to velocity particle has in that region of space.
Let's say we have two cases: one particle has velocity given by v(t)=v0*Cos(w*t), and other by v(t)=v0-v1*Cos(w*t), (v0>v1).
Since particle spends more time in regions of low velocity this should imply that probability to find a particle with low velocity is bigger than to find it with high velocity . For the first case probability to find a particle with velocity around v0 should be equal to probability to find a particle with velocity around -v0. In the second case the probability to find a particle with velocity around v0-v1 should be much bigger that to find it with velocity v0+v1, but on the other hand v(t) is distribution of velocity of a particle in time, and from this it looks that probability to find a particle with velocity around v0-v1 should be equal to probability to find a particle with velocity around v0+v1.
All opinions appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
j1m1 said:
In the second case the probability to find a particle with velocity around v0-v1 should be much bigger that to find it with velocity v0+v1
It will be bigger, but not necessarily much bigger.

but on the other hand v(t) is distribution of velocity of a particle in time, and from this it looks that probability to find a particle with velocity around v0-v1 should be equal to probability to find a particle with velocity around v0+v1.
I don't follow your reasoning here. Can you try to explain in more detail why you think this?
 
I think probability in low velocity region should depend on v0-v1 (the closer they are together, the longer the time particle spends in low velocity region).
My reasoning is: if you look at v(t)=v0-v1*Cos(w*t), particle's velocity oscillates around v0, and Cos function is symmetric in t, meaning in one full period it will be as much positive as it will be negative,and in the same way. If I were to choose random time t, just by looking at this velocity distribution, I would have equal probability that particle has velocity around v0+v1 as v0-v1.
 
The cos function is symmetric, but the function ##t\mapsto v(t)## is not symmetric because of the asymmetric velocity v0, and it is that function that determines the likelihood of finding a point in a region, not just the Cos function.
 
Ok I think I understand now. Thank you for clarifying.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Back
Top