Classicality in Bell's original reasoning

In summary, the assumption of classicality is made when trying to explain the results of measurements that show perfect correlations. This so called "classicality" is inferred (not assumed) from locality and prediction of perfect correlations.
  • #106
Closed pending moderation

Edit: after discussion we have decided to leave this thread closed
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
I Contextuality, Complementarity, Signaling, and Bell tests
Replies
0
Views
960
I Bell vs Kolmogorov: Unravelling Probability Theory Limits
3
Replies
93
Views
6K
I Looking For Help Understanding Bell's Theorem, Hidden Variables & QM
3
Replies
80
Views
5K
A Does the Bell theorem assume reality?
7
Replies
220
Views
20K
A Did rotating polarizer show violations of Bell's Inequality?
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
A Can entanglement be detected in a single Bell pair?
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
I Is Bell's Theorem Inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics?
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
B The match rates in Bell Tests -- Lower than 50%?
Replies
28
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top