Closing a door by throwing something at it

  • Thread starter Thread starter LocalStudent
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Throwing a lump of sticky clay at a door is less effective than throwing a tennis ball of the same mass due to the principles of momentum and kinetic energy. The clay sticks to the door, meaning some kinetic energy remains with the clay, while the tennis ball, in an elastic collision, transfers all its energy to the door, causing it to move. In a perfectly elastic collision, the door can achieve twice the velocity compared to a perfectly inelastic collision where the clay sticks. This demonstrates that the type of collision significantly impacts the energy transfer and resulting motion. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the effectiveness of different projectiles in closing a door.
LocalStudent
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Just say I decide to close my door by throwing a tennis ball or a lump of sticky clay at the door. Both have the same mass.

I would say throwing the lump of sticky clay would be more effective.

Is this due to the conservation of momentum or kinetic energy?
Because the clay does not bounce back and therefore all the kinetic energy of the clay goes into moving the door.. <- would this be the conservation of kinetic energy and is my reasoning correct?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on your door. If the clump/ball has about the same mass as the door and friction is negligible, then, no, the elastic collision (the tennis ball) would be more effective. When the clump sticks to the door, and both swing shut, the clump still has kinetic energy because it is still moving. This means that there is still energy in the clump that has not been transferred to the door. If the door has no initial friction and starts at rest, (and the thrown object has about the same mass as the door) then all of the energy from the thrown object will be transferred to the door. After the elastic collision, the tennis ball will be at rest and the door will be moving. Think Newton's Cradle. A tennis ball is a bad visual because it is so light. A better comparison would be a basketball versus a sticky clump of clay.
 
chrisbaird said:
A tennis ball is a bad visual because it is so light. A better comparison would be a basketball versus a sticky clump of clay.

So what if you were comparing the effects of the 50g tennis ball and a 50g lump of clay?
 
LocalStudent said:
Because the clay does not bounce back and therefore all the kinetic energy of the clay goes into moving the door.
In real life some energy will go into deforming the clay, of course, but that can be ignored here. Regarding kinetic energy, after the clay sticks to the door, it will still be moving, and so it will still have kinetic energy. Just think of this as a collision in one dimension, and solve the general case elastically and inelastically.
 
If you work it out using the classical laws of conservation of mass and conservation of energy, you will find that when one mass (the ball) collides with a second mass that is initially at rest (the door), the second mass will acquire twice the velocity in a perfectly elastic collision (bouncing) that it would in a perfectly inelastic collision (sticking). This result is exact (within classical mechanics) and general, no matter what the masses of the objects are or the initial velocity. Go ahead and work out the ratio velastic/vinelastic using the conservation laws and you will find everything cancels in the end leaving only the number 2.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top