B Coefficient of Restitution in x and y

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the direction of objects after a two-body collision, it is valid to break down the relative velocities into x and y components, especially in a two-dimensional plane. For linear collisions, one can assign positive and negative velocities based on a fixed orientation of the line. When analyzing collisions involving angles, such as 120 degrees, the velocities can be expressed in terms of their components, with the coefficient of restitution (denoted as e_x) applied accordingly. It is essential to assign appropriate signs to each component to accurately describe the collision dynamics. Understanding these principles aids in effectively analyzing and predicting the outcomes of collisions.
unseeingdog
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
I am currently studying collisions in high school and my teacher told us that, in order to calculate the direction of each object after a 2-body collision, we could change the values in the relative velocity terms of the equation of the coefficient of restitution to the components in x and y. Is this true? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If collisions are on a line, you can fix a positive orientation of the line so you have positive and negative velocities respect the two opposit directions... it is possible to interpret the minus in front of the vector as a velocity in the opposite sense ...
If the collision is in the plane you can always do the same component by component ...
I don't know if I answered ...
Ssnow
 
Ssnow said:
If collisions are on a line, you can fix a positive orientation of the line so you have positive and negative velocities respect the two opposit directions... it is possible to interpret the minus in front of the vector as a velocity in the opposite sense ...
If the collision is in the plane you can always do the same component by component ...
I don't know if I answered ...
Ssnow
So, say, if one of the bodies moves along the x axis, and the other moves with an angle of 120 with respect to the horizontal, one can write ##e_x = (v_2cos(120) - v_1)/(u_1 - u_2cos(120)## ?
 
mmmmh, what is ##e_{x}## ? ... if the ##\vec{v}=(v_{1},v_{2})## is the first vector and ##\vec{u}=(u_{1},u_{2})## the second forming an angle of ##120°## then ##\vec{v}=(v_{1},0)## because is on the ##x## axis and ##\vec{u}=(u\cos{(120)},u\sin{(120)})## where ##u## is the magnitude of ##\vec{u}##. Now you must fix a sign ##\pm## to each component that describes the collision ...
Ssnow
 
Ssnow said:
mmmmh, what is ##e_{x}## ? ... if the ##\vec{v}=(v_{1},v_{2})## is the first vector and ##\vec{u}=(u_{1},u_{2})## the second forming an angle of ##120°## then ##\vec{v}=(v_{1},0)## because is on the ##x## axis and ##\vec{u}=(u\cos{(120)},u\sin{(120)})## where ##u## is the magnitude of ##\vec{u}##. Now you must fix a sign ##\pm## to each component that describes the collision ...
Ssnow
I meant ##e_x## to be the coefficient of restitution. Sorry for not specifying. Anyways, I get it now. Thanks
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top