Collaborative Research: Resources, Tools & Protocols

  • Thread starter Thread starter a1call
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research
AI Thread Summary
Collaborative research can benefit from attending conferences and networking with individuals who share similar interests, as there are limited online resources for connecting potential collaborators. While the Polymath Project offers a framework for collaboration, it has specific criteria for problem proposals and lacks centralized oversight, which may complicate progress. Intellectual property protection in collaborative exchanges is not well-defined, and legal agreements should be established beforehand, especially when one party is affiliated with a company. Participants must navigate proprietary rights to avoid conflicts during collaboration. Overall, careful planning and legal considerations are essential for successful collaborative research endeavors.
a1call
Messages
90
Reaction score
5
Hi all,

I would like to know your thoughts on the subject of collaborative research.
Are there resources on the internet to hook up potential individuals?
Are there tools or protocols to ensure intellectual property protection in case of disclosure and collaborative exchange?

Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
a1call said:
Are there resources on the internet to hook up potential individuals?

For math? No.

You should attend conferences, or contact people whose papers you find interesting. If they're interested in the subject, they may choose to collaborate with you. It helps if you're in the same university, but it doesn't need to be.

Are there tools or protocols to ensure intellectual property protection in case of disclosure and collaborative exchange?

No.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Thank you for all the replies. The polymath seems to be limited in scope. What is the criteria for proposing problems? Who is in charge of overall progress plan?
 
If everyone is working self-employed, then there may not be restrictions. But if one of the collaborators is doing this work for a company, there probably are the proprietary information rights of the company to consider. That should all be worked out legally before the collaboration begins.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top