- #71
- 23,583
- 5,824
Thank you for finally acknowledging that mass A can be accelerating upward even though its initial upward velocity is zero.theodoros.mihos said:You are right. Sorry for my English. A body can have acceleration while its velocity is steel zero.
But this problem is more complicate because the "radius" of A movement is not constant.
Excuse me, but my analysis does not assume that the movement of mass A is circular with radius l, and it does take into account the fact that the radial distance of mass A from the pulley is not constant. The equations that I presented in post #62 give the actual trajectory of mass A at short times, where x is the distance mass A moves to the left, and y is the distance mass A moves upward. If we eliminate time t from these equations, we obtain:All works with assumption about "circular" movement with radius l probably are basically wrong.
$$y=\frac{x^2}{4l}$$
This is consistent with a radius of curvature of the circular arc of mass A of 2l, rather than l. So mass A does execute a circular arc at short times, but, as a result of the increasing radial distance of mass A from the pulley, it is initially traveling along an arc of radius 2l rather than l.
Chet