Collision of two rolling bodies

AI Thread Summary
A solid sphere rolling without slipping collides elastically with an identical stationary sphere, raising questions about the post-collision velocities. The discussion emphasizes the conservation of angular momentum about the point of contact during the collision, while neglecting ground friction due to the brief nature of the impact. It is noted that the impulse between the colliding spheres is significant, despite other forces being negligible. Participants confirm that the second sphere will acquire the linear velocity of the first sphere post-collision, though the relevance of this point is questioned. The focus remains on accurately applying the conservation laws to solve for the first sphere's linear velocity after it resumes pure rolling.
Arka420
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid sphere is rolling without slipping on rough ground with an angular velocity w and linear velocity v. It collides elastically with an another identical sphere at rest. Radius of each sphere is R and mass m. What is the linear velocity of the first sphere after it starts pure rolling again?

Homework Equations


The equations for the conservation of angular momentum.

The Attempt at a Solution


The basic idea is conserving angular momentum about the point of contact. Once that is done,the problem will be solved easily. Framing the equation for the conservation of momentum appears to be a problem (for me).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to assume no friction between the balls.
The first thing to do is analyse the collision ignoring the ground. This is ok because the collision is considered to be very brief, so any strictly limited force (gravity, normal force from ground, friction from ground) has negligible impulse during the collision. The impulse between the colliding balls is non-negligible, regardless of the brevity.
 
haruspex said:
You have to assume no friction between the balls.
The first thing to do is analyse the collision ignoring the ground. This is ok because the collision is considered to be very brief, so any strictly limited force (gravity, normal force from ground, friction from ground) has negligible impulse during the collision. The impulse between the colliding balls is non-negligible, regardless of the brevity.
Pretty much OK. And is it OK to say,that after collision,second sphere acquires linear velocity v?
 
Arka420 said:
Pretty much OK. And is it OK to say,that after collision,second sphere acquires linear velocity v?
Yes, but is that relevant?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top