Collisions problem (How should I approach it)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a collision problem involving two blocks, focusing on the application of conservation of linear momentum and energy. The initial conditions indicate that only block A has kinetic energy before the collision, while post-collision, the kinetic energy of the system is halved. The user expresses confusion about handling three unknowns and whether to apply conservation principles correctly. A response clarifies the treatment of velocities, suggesting that the negative sign for block B's final velocity should be reconsidered to ensure all speeds are treated as positive. The conversation emphasizes the importance of setting up the equations accurately to solve for the unknowns effectively.
Hindi
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I came across a problem on collisions on one of my professors old exams. The problem is:

http://home.comcast.net/~msharma15/problem_2.jpg

The way I am trying to approach it is by applying the conservation of linear momentum and energy, but the problem is that I still get left with 3 unknowns.

Here is what I know:
Before the collision, only block A has kinetic energy.

After the collision, the K.E. of system is (1/2 K.E. initial). block A has -1/2MV^2[/color] and block B has 1/2MV^2[/color].

The final collision is what confuses me. Should I just work with K.E.i (only block A moving) with conservation of linear momentum?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
by cons of p,
m_1v_{1i}=m_1v_{1f}-m_2v_{2f}
where v_2f is reckoned as negative
By the energy conditions,
m_1v_{1i}^2=\frac {1}{2}(m_1v_{1f}^2+m_2v_{2f}^2)
which gives two equations with two unknowns.
 
Thanks for the reply
StephenPrivitera. I am just wondering why you made m_2v_2f negative in the first equation?? Should it be the other way around?
 
The equations should be:
m_1v_{1i}=-m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f}
\frac {1}{4}m_1v_{1i}^2=\frac {1}{2}(m_1v_{1f}^2+m_2v_{2f}^2)
(where the speeds are all positive)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top