Compact support of matter fields

haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
3,063
Reaction score
1,581
Hi,

I have a question concerning the asymptotic boundary conditions on matter fields and the Riemann tensor. What is the precise relation between saying that "the matter fields go to zero at spatial infinity" and "the matter fields have compact support"? And how natural is it to state that the Riemann tensor has "compact support" on a certain spacetime? I would say that if the matter fields have compact support, the Riemann tensor also has, right?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that people often abuse the concept of "having compact support" whenever they actually mean a certain asymptotic behaviour. Can anyone comment on this?
 
To say that the matter fields have compact support means that their intersection with a Cauchy surface has compact support in the mathematical sense. This is usually used loosely to mean that all matter fields (exactly) vanish outside of some finite spatial region. Saying that the matter fields fall off at some rate near infinity is therefore a weaker condition.

Einstein's equation implies that the Ricci tensor will have compact support if the matter fields do. The same is not true of the Riemann tensor. It will usually fall off at some rate as one moves away from the matter, but there is no radius beyond which it will vanish.
 
Ok, thanks! But in three dimensions compactly supported matter fields then do imply that the Riemann tensor has compact support, right?
 
Yes, that's right.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top