- #1
Jurgen M
Mercedes CLA has Cd =0.22(180 Blue Efficiency) and Cd=0.23(180).
CLS C218 has 0.26, but CLS has wide tires, no flat bottom and other aero features like CLA.
aero features of CLA:
https://www.car-engineer.com/mercedes-cla-is-the-most-aerodynamic-production-car-of-the-world/
If we compare just body shape ,do you think CLS has better Cd from CLA, for example if we put narrow tires, flat bottom etc maybe CLS will have even better Cd then CLA?
I ask this because CLA is short, rear roofline looks to stubby, rear window+trunk slope is too steep,this can cause flow separation or too steep slope induce low pressure at rear window+trunk.
CLS is longer, more streamlined siluetthe,rear end slope is not so steep.
CLS C218 has 0.26, but CLS has wide tires, no flat bottom and other aero features like CLA.
aero features of CLA:
https://www.car-engineer.com/mercedes-cla-is-the-most-aerodynamic-production-car-of-the-world/
If we compare just body shape ,do you think CLS has better Cd from CLA, for example if we put narrow tires, flat bottom etc maybe CLS will have even better Cd then CLA?
I ask this because CLA is short, rear roofline looks to stubby, rear window+trunk slope is too steep,this can cause flow separation or too steep slope induce low pressure at rear window+trunk.
CLS is longer, more streamlined siluetthe,rear end slope is not so steep.