MHB Complex Numbers - from Polar to Algebraic

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting complex numbers from polar to algebraic form, specifically for the expressions rcis(90° + θ) and rcis(90° - θ). The correct algebraic forms are identified as -y + ix and y + ix, respectively. The confusion arises regarding the first expression, where the user expects -x + iy instead of -y + ix. The mathematical derivation shows that the transformation involves using trigonometric identities, leading to the correct results. Understanding these conversions relies on the properties of sine and cosine functions.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am trying to find the algebraic representation of the following numbers:

\[rcis(90^{\circ}+\theta )\]

and

\[rcis(90^{\circ}-\theta )\]

The answers in the book are:

\[-y+ix\]

and

\[y+ix\]

respectively.

I don't get it...

In the first case, if I take 90 degrees (working with degrees, not radians in this question) plus the angel, I get a point in the second quadrant. Why isn't the answer -x+iy ?

View attachment 6854

Thank you !
 

Attachments

  • complex.JPG
    complex.JPG
    10.7 KB · Views: 105
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$z = r[\cos(90^\circ + \theta) + i\sin(90^\circ + \theta)]$$

$z = r\bigg[\cos(90^\circ)\cos(\theta) - \sin(90^\circ)\sin(\theta) + i[\sin(90^\circ)\cos(\theta) + \cos(90^\circ)\sin(\theta)] \bigg]$

$z = r\bigg[-\sin(\theta) + i \cos(\theta) \bigg]$

$z = -r\sin(\theta) + i\cdot r\cos(\theta) = -y + ix$

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$$z = r[\cos(90^\circ - \theta) + i\sin(90^\circ - \theta)]$$

$z = r\bigg[\cos(90^\circ)\cos(\theta) + \sin(90^\circ)\sin(\theta) + i[\sin(90^\circ)\cos(\theta) - \cos(90^\circ)\sin(\theta)] \bigg]$

$z = r\bigg[\sin(\theta) + i \cos(\theta) \bigg]$

$z = r\sin(\theta) + i\cdot r\cos(\theta) = y + ix$
 
Or just recall that [math]cos(90- x)= sin(x)[/math] and [math]cos(90- x)= sin(x)[/math] from the basic definitions of "sine" and "cosine" instead of using the more general "sum" identity.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top