Compute $a_{1996}$ for $\prod_{k=1}^{1996} (1+kx^{3^k})$

  • MHB
  • Thread starter anemone
  • Start date
In summary, the purpose of computing $a_{1996}$ for the given expression is to determine the value of the expression $\prod_{k=1}^{1996} (1+kx^{3^k})$ at the 1996th term, which can provide insight into its overall behavior and trends. $a_{1996}$ can be calculated by plugging in the value of 1996 for the variable k in the expression and then simplifying the resulting expression. The variable x represents a placeholder for a numerical value that can be substituted into the expression, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of its behavior. The given expression can also be simplified and rewritten in a different form using logarithm and exponential functions. It has
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Let $\displaystyle \prod_{k=1}^{1996} (1+kx^{3^k})=1+a_1x^{n_1}+a_2x^{n_2}+\cdots+a_mx^{n_m}$, where $a_1,\,a_2,\,\cdots$ are nonzero and $n_1<n_2<\cdots<n_m$.

Compute $a_{1996}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Note: solution not verified, possible off-by-one error, but it definitely works.

We express $a_n$ as a recurrence by induction on $k$. First consider the base case $k = 1$, which gives us $a_0 = a_1 = 1$. Suppose that for some $k - 1 \in \mathbb{N}$, we have nonzero polynomial coefficients $a_0, a_1, \cdots, a_{n - 1}$ for some $n$, then it follows that:
$$(1 + k x^{3^k}) \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{n_i} = \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{n_i} + k \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{3^k + n_i}$$
We observe that $3^k$ is larger than all exponents $n_i$ which are at most $3^k - 1$, being a sum of powers of $3$ less than $k$, and so the coefficients $a_0$ to $a_{n - 1}$ remain unchanged by the multiplication by $1 + k x^{3^k}$. Furthermore, as a result the polynomial for $k$ must then have $2n$ nonzero terms (twice as many). These two facts together allows us to derive $k$ from $n$ as $k = \lceil \log_2(n + 1) \rceil$ and hence express $a_n$ as a simple recurrence:
$$a_n = k a_{n - 2^{k - 1}} ~ ~ ~ \text{where} ~ k = \lceil \log_2(n + 1) \rceil, a_0 = a_1 = 1$$
So that:
$$a_{1996} = 11 a_{1996 - 1024} = 11 a_{972}$$
$$a_{972} = 10 a_{972 - 512} = 10 a_{460}$$
$$a_{460} = 9 a_{460 - 256} = 9 a_{204}$$
$$a_{204} = 8 a_{204 - 128} = 8 a_{76}$$
$$a_{76} = 7 a_{76 - 64} = 7 a_8$$
$$a_{8} = 4 a_{8 - 8} = 4 a_0$$
And so we conclude that:
$$a_{1996} = 11 \times 10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 \times 4 \times a_0 = 221760$$
 
  • #3
Amended solution:

We express $a_n$ as a recurrence by induction on $k$. First consider the base case $k = 1$, which gives us $a_0 = a_1 = 1$. Suppose that for some $k - 1 \in \mathbb{N}$, we have nonzero polynomial coefficients $a_0, a_1, \cdots, a_{n - 1}$ for some $n$, then it follows that:
$$(1 + k x^{3^k}) \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{n_i} = \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{n_i} + k \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{3^k + n_i}$$
We observe that $3^k$ is larger than all exponents $n_i$ which are at most $3^k - 1$, being a sum of powers of $3$ less than $k$, and so the coefficients $a_0$ to $a_{n - 1}$ remain unchanged by the multiplication by $1 + k x^{3^k}$. Furthermore, as a result the polynomial for $k$ must then have $2n$ nonzero terms (twice as many). These two facts together allows us to derive $k$ from $n$ as $k = \lceil \log_2(n + 1) \rceil$ and hence express $a_n$ as a simple recurrence:
$$a_n = k a_{n - 2^{k - 1}} ~ ~ ~ \text{where} ~ k = \lceil \log_2(n + 1) \rceil, a_0 = a_1 = 1$$
So that:
$$a_{1996} = 11 a_{1996 - 1024} = 11 a_{972}$$
$$a_{972} = 10 a_{972 - 512} = 10 a_{460}$$
$$a_{460} = 9 a_{460 - 256} = 9 a_{204}$$
$$a_{204} = 8 a_{204 - 128} = 8 a_{76}$$
$$a_{76} = 7 a_{76 - 64} = 7 a_{12}$$
$$a_{12} = 4 a_{12 - 8} = 4 a_4$$
$$a_{4} = 3 a_{4 - 4} = 3 a_0$$
And so we conclude that:
$$a_{1996} = 11 \times 10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 \times 4 \times 3 \times a_0 = 665280$$
 
  • #4
Bacterius said:
Amended solution:

We express $a_n$ as a recurrence by induction on $k$. First consider the base case $k = 1$, which gives us $a_0 = a_1 = 1$. Suppose that for some $k - 1 \in \mathbb{N}$, we have nonzero polynomial coefficients $a_0, a_1, \cdots, a_{n - 1}$ for some $n$, then it follows that:
$$(1 + k x^{3^k}) \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{n_i} = \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{n_i} + k \sum_{i = 0}^{n - 1} a_i x^{3^k + n_i}$$
We observe that $3^k$ is larger than all exponents $n_i$ which are at most $3^k - 1$, being a sum of powers of $3$ less than $k$, and so the coefficients $a_0$ to $a_{n - 1}$ remain unchanged by the multiplication by $1 + k x^{3^k}$. Furthermore, as a result the polynomial for $k$ must then have $2n$ nonzero terms (twice as many). These two facts together allows us to derive $k$ from $n$ as $k = \lceil \log_2(n + 1) \rceil$ and hence express $a_n$ as a simple recurrence:
$$a_n = k a_{n - 2^{k - 1}} ~ ~ ~ \text{where} ~ k = \lceil \log_2(n + 1) \rceil, a_0 = a_1 = 1$$
So that:
$$a_{1996} = 11 a_{1996 - 1024} = 11 a_{972}$$
$$a_{972} = 10 a_{972 - 512} = 10 a_{460}$$
$$a_{460} = 9 a_{460 - 256} = 9 a_{204}$$
$$a_{204} = 8 a_{204 - 128} = 8 a_{76}$$
$$a_{76} = 7 a_{76 - 64} = 7 a_{12}$$
$$a_{12} = 4 a_{12 - 8} = 4 a_4$$
$$a_{4} = 3 a_{4 - 4} = 3 a_0$$
And so we conclude that:
$$a_{1996} = 11 \times 10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 \times 4 \times 3 \times a_0 = 665280$$

Thanks for participating, Bacterius! Yes, your amended solution is correct and the subtraction error was spotted by Opalg and so I want to thank Opalg because he has helped me numerous times in the past even if he was busy at the time.
 
  • #5


To compute $a_{1996}$, we can use the formula given in the problem to expand the product and then identify the term with $x^{1996}$ as $a_{1996}$.

First, let's rewrite the product as $\prod_{k=1}^{1996} (1+kx^{3^k}) = (1+1x^{3^1})(1+2x^{3^2})\cdots(1+1996x^{3^{1996}})$.

Expanding this product, we get:
$(1+1x^{3^1})(1+2x^{3^2})\cdots(1+1996x^{3^{1996}})$
$= (1+1x^3)(1+2x^9)(1+3x^{27})\cdots(1+1996x^{3^{1996}})$

Now, we can see that the term with $x^{1996}$ will only come from the factors with a power of $x$ that is a multiple of $3$. Since $1996 = 3\times 665 + 1$, the only factor that will contribute to the term with $x^{1996}$ is $1+665x^{1995}$. Therefore, $a_{1996} = 665$.

In general, given a term $x^m$ in the expansion, we can find the corresponding coefficient $a_m$ by dividing $m$ by 3 and taking the remainder. If the remainder is 0, then the coefficient is the number of the factor (i.e. $1, 2, 3, \cdots$). If the remainder is 1 or 2, then the coefficient is 0.

In conclusion, $a_{1996} = 665$ in this case.
 

FAQ: Compute $a_{1996}$ for $\prod_{k=1}^{1996} (1+kx^{3^k})$

What is the purpose of computing $a_{1996}$ for the given expression?

The purpose of computing $a_{1996}$ is to determine the value of the expression $\prod_{k=1}^{1996} (1+kx^{3^k})$ at the 1996th term, which can provide insight into the overall behavior and trends of the expression.

How do you calculate $a_{1996}$ for the given expression?

To calculate $a_{1996}$, we can plug in the value of 1996 for the variable k in the expression $\prod_{k=1}^{1996} (1+kx^{3^k})$ and then simplify the resulting expression using basic algebraic operations.

What is the significance of the variable x in the given expression?

The variable x represents a placeholder for a numerical value that can be substituted into the expression to yield a specific result. It allows for the expression to be evaluated for various values of x, providing a more comprehensive understanding of its behavior.

Can the given expression be simplified or rewritten in a different form?

Yes, the given expression can be rewritten as a sum of terms using the logarithm and exponential functions, which can be useful for further analysis and calculations.

Are there any real-world applications for this type of expression?

Yes, this type of expression can be found in various mathematical models and equations used in fields such as physics, engineering, and economics. It can also be used in the analysis of data and patterns in scientific research.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
936
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top