I Confused about a matrix element

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! My questions is in the context of a matrix element in a diatomic molecule. I will rephrase it as well as I can to remove any non needed complexity. I denote the sperical harmonic ##Y_m^l = |m,l>##. I have the operators ##n_{0} = Y_1^0## and ##n_{\pm 1} = Y_1^{\pm 1}##. I also define the operator ##\mathbf{N}## which is the raising/lowering operators for ##|m,l>##. For example, ##N_+|m,l>\propto |m,l+1>## (the prefactors don't matter for my question). Now, I build the operator ##H = i(n_+N_- + n_-N_+)##. If I calculate the matrix element ##<0,0|n_+N_- + n_-N_+|1,0> = <0,0|n-|1,1> + <0,0|n+|1,-1> = 2<0,0|n+|1,-1> ##, which is some non-zero value. However, if I calculate ##<1,0|n_+N_- + n_-N_+|0,0>## I get zero, simply because ##N_{\pm 1} = |0,0> = 0##. What am I doing wrong? This is a Hermitian operator so the 2 matrix elements should be the same. What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Malamala said:
This is a Hermitian operator so the 2 matrix elements should be the same. What am I missing?
Your operator ##H=i(n_+ N_- + n_- N_+)## is not Hermitian. This is because the ''raising/lowering'' operators ##N_\pm## act on the spherical harmonics, and since your ##n_0## and ##n_\pm## are spherical harmonics themselves, the operators ##N_\pm## do not commute with ##n_0## and ##n_\pm## . Compute ##H^\dagger## to see this.

More importantly, you did not specify what you mean by ##l## and ##m## in your question. However, the standard convention found throughout the literature is that, rather, ##l## denotes the angular momentum quantum number while ##m## is the angular momentum projection quantum number (the projection onto some "Z-axis"). The spherical harmonics, which I will denote as ##Y_{l,m} \equiv |l,m\rangle##, are the eigenfunctions of the angular momentum operators: ##\mathbf{L}^2## and ##L_z##. Now, both of these operators commute with the Hamiltonian of, e.g., the hydrogen atom. But if you are interested in diatomic molecules:
Malamala said:
My questions is in the context of a matrix element in a diatomic molecule.
then you must remember that ##\mathbf{L}^2## do not commute with the molecular Hamiltonian (only the operator ##L_z## does). So for a diatomic molecule, you do not even have a well-defined notion of a quantum number ##l## ##-## assuming, of course, that you are referring in your question to the orbital anguar momentum of the molecular electrons. If this is the case, then the "raising/lowering" operators do not act in a way that you assumed in your question (the result is not a proportionality, which you denoted by "##\propto##").
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top