Confused about answer key's solution to a work/energy problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics801
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the solution to a work/energy problem in a physics placement exam. The original poster questions why the solution manual uses (x_{max} - x) instead of (x - x_{max}) when calculating work done against gravity on a ramp. Clarification is provided that the choice of positive direction is crucial; if gravity is considered negative along the slope, then the positive direction is up the slope, affecting the sign in the equation. The importance of consistently defining positive and negative directions in physics problems is emphasized, along with the necessity of checking the signs of results. Ultimately, the poster acknowledges the misunderstanding and appreciates the clarification.
physics801
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for my college's physics placement and I'm frustrated because I don't get the solution to problem 1d.

Homework Statement



The problem is here: http://ocw.edu.ht/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/exams/exam_2.pdf

Solution manual is here: http://ocw.edu.ht/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/exams/quiz2_sol.pdf

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a mspaint diagram of what I have: http://cl.ly/image/3b1o082l1k3a (x_{max} is defined in 1a, which is in the soln manual)

Basically since gravity is opposing the direction of travel (up the ramp), I think the solution to 1d(i) should be work=-mg(h-h_{max})=-mgsin\theta(x-x_{max}). However the solution manual has the same thing except x_{max}-x in the parentheses. Why is this? Shouldn't it be final - initial, which means x-x_{max} in the parentheses?

edit: I also have the same question for 1d(ii) and (iii) but hopefully it will be answered by explaining (i)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to decide which way is positive and stick to it.
If the force due to gravity is being taken as negative along the slope then the positive direction is up the slope. But x is measured down the slope, so it's (-x) - (-xmax)
It is always a good idea to sanity-check the sign of a result. It is clear that the work done by gravity here is negative.
 
Look at the direction of x, what does x mean in terms of the spring?
 
haruspex said:
You have to decide which way is positive and stick to it.
If the force due to gravity is being taken as negative along the slope then the positive direction is up the slope. But x is measured down the slope, so it's (-x) - (-xmax)
It is always a good idea to sanity-check the sign of a result. It is clear that the work done by gravity here is negative.

Oh whoops, I completely missed that. Thanks for the help!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top