Confused about solenoid radius from this site

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the radius of a solenoid and its impact on the magnetic field strength. A referenced equation suggests that the radius is calculated as the difference between the outer and inner radii, but this raises questions about scenarios with only one layer of coils. Participants clarify that while more layers can affect the radius, the number of coils and current also play crucial roles in determining the magnetic field strength. The logarithmic nature of the equation complicates the relationship between radius and field strength, emphasizing the need for careful calculations. Ultimately, the consensus is that more coils generally increase magnetic field strength, despite the complexities introduced by radius variations.
ZecronTech
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
So I was reading a thread on PF talking about the radius of a solenoid and Bob S answered with a link:
Bob S said:
This equation for the on-axis field is exact both inside and outside the solenoid:

http://www.netdenizen.com/emagnettest/solenoids/?solenoid

You can add more layers at the ends.

Bob S

On that site, it states that the Radius = the outer radius - the inner. It doesn't make sense. What happens when there is only one layer of coil and the outer radius (OR) is basically the inner radius (IR). That would create a larger magnetic field than if I had multiple layers of coils and the OR > IR which would then create a smaller one. I don't understand why.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
On that site, it states that the Radius = the outer radius - the inner.
Where?
What happens when there is only one layer of coil and the outer radius (OR) is basically the inner radius (IR).
Even in that case, your cables have a finite width.

You can probably consider this equation in the limit r1 -> r2, and get a simpler equation for the case where the difference between both is not significant.
 
mfb said:
Where?

In the equation where the denominator is 2(r2-r1). So I'm assuming that the more layers of coils you have, the greater r2-r1 is and therefore less magnetic fields. Which I don't get. I thought the more coils you have, the greater the magnetic field.
 
Careful, the radii are used in the logarithms as well. It is not clear which effect will dominate if you don't calculate it.

"More coils" would also increase n (more windings) or I (more current), cancelling this effect. More coils give a higher field strength.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
mfb said:
Careful, the radii are used in the logarithms as well. It is not clear which effect will dominate if you don't calculate it.

Oh...Whoops. Thank you. I can't believe I forgot about that.
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'How Does Jaguar's 1980s V12 Dual Coil Ignition System Enhance Spark Strength?'
I have come across a dual coil ignition system as used by Jaguar on their V12 in the 1980's. It uses two ignition coils with their primary windings wired in parallel. The primary coil has its secondary winding wired to the distributor and then to the spark plugs as is standard practice. However, the auxiliary coil has it secondary winding output sealed off. The purpose of the system was to provide a stronger spark to the plugs, always a difficult task with the very short dwell time of a...
Back
Top