Confused about time dilain length contraction

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between time dilation and length contraction in the context of special relativity. It highlights the confusion regarding deriving the time dilation formula for a horizontal clock while assuming length contraction, leading to a perceived circular dependency. The participant questions whether length contraction is a direct result of time dilation, emphasizing that both types of clocks should remain synchronized in an inertial reference frame. They argue that the derivation of time dilation should be possible by only accepting the constancy of the speed of light. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the mathematical relationship between these two phenomena without relying on one to explain the other.
teodorakis
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
hi, we all know when we derive the time dialtion formula we choose a vertical light clock, and basically since the light take a longer zig-zag path to the stationary observer, the time is dilated. That's ok but when deriving length contraction, firstly we accept time dilation for horizontal clock and then do some maths and derive the length contraction formula, so the horizontal clocks affected by both time dilation and length contraction, but what i want to ask is, does length contraction occurs as a result of time dilation?
I mean think of a vertical and a horizontal clock in a spaceship both in sync in that reference frame, now to an observer that has a speed v according to that ship these two clocks must dilate at the same rate by the postulate of relativity, they are not in sync though. Anyway i can understand they should all dely at the same rate, cause otherwise we have a detector of absolute motion, so no matter the choice of clock we use they should be all sync in an inertial reference frame(if we sync them of course). But when i want to mathematically want to derive the time dilaion in horizontal clock i have to accept the length contraction at first, i can't derive it alone, or like all of the sources did, time is dilated same rate as vertical clock adn from here derive thelegth contraction formula. I'm like in a vicious circle, can not derive one ithout other matheatically, please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In relativistic theory all physics laws are the same independent of the reference frame. When time dilates, so must length also change in order that the speed is preserved: speed = length / time.
 
let me clarify things, we don't need to know the machinery or principle of the other clocks, they have to delay asme rate as the vertical light clock, otherwisse the observer in the moving vehicle has a way of understanding that he is moving by using the mismatch in his clocks.
That's ok, but i am trying to derive the time dilation formula in the horizontal clock, just like we derive in vertical clcok, such that i only accept that the speed of light is constant for all observers, with just this assumption, i think we should be able to derive the time dilation alone, shouldn't we?
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
629
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K