A Confusing eigensolutions of a wave function

Yourong Zang
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Consider a potential cavity
$$V(r)=\begin{cases}\infty, &x\in(-\infty,0]\\\frac{\hslash^2}{m}\Omega\delta(x-a), &x\in(0,\infty)\end{cases}$$
The eigenfunction of the wave function in this field suffices
$$-\frac{\hslash^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}+\frac{\hslash^2}{m}\Omega\delta(x-a)\psi=E\psi$$
A textbook gives the following solution:
$$\psi(x)=\begin{cases}Asin(kx), &x\in(0,a)\\ sin(kx+\phi), &x\in(a,\infty)\end{cases}$$
where
$$k^2=\frac{2mE}{\hslash^2}$$
I can clearly understand the first part but in the second part, why is the amplitude of the function 1 and why is there a phase angle?

And is this wave
$$\psi(x)=\sin(kx+\phi)$$
called something like the "excitation mode"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Yourong Zang, ##\qquad## :welcome: ##\qquad## !

Please post this kind of questions in the homework forum and use the template -- it's mandatory, see guidelines

Your problem is worked out here With a positive omega you have a delta barrier, not a cavity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Yourong Zang
BvU said:
Hello Yourong Zang, ##\qquad## :welcome: ##\qquad## !

Please post this kind of questions in the homework forum and use the template -- it's mandatory, see guidelines

Your problem is worked out here With a positive omega you have a delta barrier, not a cavity.
Thank you.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top