Conservation of Angular Momentum of a Disk

AI Thread Summary
A solid disk with an initial angular velocity of 0.094 rad/s and a moment of inertia of 0.12 kg·m² has sand dropped onto it, forming a ring at a distance of 0.48 m with a mass of 0.36 kg. The conservation of angular momentum principle is applied, where the initial angular momentum (L0) equals the final angular momentum (Lf). The moment of inertia of the sand ring is calculated as (0.36 kg)(0.48 m)², and it must be added to the disk's moment of inertia to find the total final inertia (If). The discussion concludes with the realization that a calculation error was the source of confusion, leading to the correct understanding of how to incorporate the disk's inertia.
shaka23h
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A solid disk rotates at an angular velocity of 0.094 rad/s with respect to an axis perpendicular to the disk at its center. The moment of inertia of the disk is 0.12 kg·m2. From above, sand is dropped straight down onto this rotating disk, so that a thin uniform ring of sand is formed at a distance 0.48 m from the axis. The sand in the ring has a mass of 0.36 kg. After all the sand is in place, what is the angular velocity of the disk?



I just have no clue why I'm not getting the correct answer on this problem.

Here are my steps

I know that since Momentum is convserved L0 = Lf or I0W0 IfWf

W = angular velocity

so I set (0.12 kg m ^2)(.094 rad/s) = (If)(Wf)


Since we were to treat the Inertia of it to be a hoop the equation of Inertia is I = MR ^2

So this is my final equation (0.12 kg m ^2)(.094 rad/s) = (If)(Wf)


I think where I'm going wrong is when I solved for Inertia (I) for If I used (.36 kg)(.48 ^2)


Please point out what I need to do to correct this problem

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sand increases the moment of intertia of the disk/sand system, but it does not replace the disk. It looks like you have not included the disk in your I_f.
 
ok am I suppose to include the inertia of the disc by adding the I0 to (.36 x .48 ^2).

I'm still not getting the answer


nvm I got it it was just an error in calculation.

you are awsome DOC :)

thx a lot
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top