Conservation of angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
Incident linearly polarized radiation can result in scattered radiation that is circularly or elliptically polarized, depending on the nature of the scatterer. In a lossless dielectric, the scattered radiation remains linearly polarized, while a conducting scatterer may allow for elliptical polarization. The conservation of angular momentum is a key consideration, as the material can gain or lose angular momentum during scattering. The intrinsic angular momentum of the photon and its position also contribute to the overall angular momentum in the system. Ultimately, the behavior of scattered radiation in relation to polarization and angular momentum conservation is complex and varies with the scattering medium.
rays
12
0
If the incident radiation is linearly polarized can the scattered radiation be circularly or elliptically polarized? If the scatter is a lossless dielectric the scattered radiation is not elliptically polarized. How about if the scatter is conducting? if the scattered radiation is elliptically polarized, does it violate the conservation of angular momentum?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scattering where?
In general, the material can get (or lose) angular momentum. In addition, angular momentum in some specific frame can come from the position of the photon itself (together with the velocity), its intrinsic angular momentum is just one component.
 
mfb,

Thank you for the quick reply!

In classical eletromagnetic theory, if the incident EM wave is linearly polarized (no angular momentum) and it is scattered by a fixed spherical perfect conductor, then can the scattered EM wave be elliptically polarized?

rays
 
I would expect this in the general case (at least for some scattering angles), but I don't know.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term (1) one may derivate (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Conservation of Angular Momentum vs a gyro at the North Pole
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Angular Momentum problem v2 (mass moving inward or outward)
Replies
5
Views
2K
Law of conservation of angular momentum
Replies
11
Views
12K
I Conservation of angular momentum during collisions
Replies
3
Views
3K
Conservation of linear and angular momentum
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Conservation of angular momentum -- spinning a bicycle wheel in space
Replies
2
Views
2K
Spinning Bike Wheel Example, how is angular momentum conserved?
Replies
9
Views
5K
2-body problem - conservation of angular momentum
Replies
40
Views
4K
Conceptual questions about Angular Momentum Conservation and torque
Replies
2
Views
3K
Why is angular momentum conserved here?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top