Conservation of energy (true or false)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy and the validity of several statements related to work and energy. The first statement about the train and wagon is deemed false, as the work done by the train is not zero due to the wagon's movement. The second statement is also false because negative net work does not always reduce kinetic energy, especially in conservative force scenarios. The third statement is clarified as true, emphasizing that both balls will have the same speed at the bottom due to gravitational potential energy being conserved, regardless of the slope's angle. Overall, the conversation highlights misconceptions about work and energy in physics, particularly regarding the effects of forces and motion.
jumptheair
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1.Consider a train that pulls a wagon. By Newton's third law, the wagon pulls on the train with an equal opposite force, therefore the work done by the train must be zero.

2.Negative net work done on an object always reduces the object's kinetic energy.

3.Two identical masses are placed on frictionless slopes at identical heights. The first slope makes an angle of 30deg with respect to the horizontal; the second slope makes an angle of 40deg. Both balls are released simultaneously. At the bottom of the slope, both balls have the same speed.

4.If the work done on an object by a force is zero, then either the force or the displacement must have zero magnitude.

5.The formula W=F d cos theta can be used only if the force is constant over the distance d.

Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy

The Attempt at a Solution



At least one of these are wrong. I don't know which one(s)
Please check and correct me. Thanks

1.False
2.False
3.False, (because mgx changes due to the difference in angle. Since f=ma, accleration will not be the same.)
4.False, (it may be the direction that makes the W=0, for example an object falling where force nor displacement is zero but W=0.)
5.True
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jumptheair said:
At least one of these are wrong. I don't know which one(s)
Please check and correct me. Thanks

1.False
2.False
3.False, (because mgx changes due to the difference in angle. Since f=ma, accleration will not be the same.)
4.False, (it may be the direction that makes the W=0, for example an object falling where force nor displacement is zero but W=0.)
5.True

3 is True. Gravity is a conservative force. All that matters is the change in height, not how you get there. So slope one will make the ball travel longer, but it will still have the same speed as ball 2. Now, the two balls will NOT get there at the same time, but when they do get there, they will have the same speed.

4 is True. Work is done by the Earth to pull the object in. W = F * D. F = gravity, D is how much it falls by.
 
Arr.. still wrong.. help is still needed
 
Last edited:
Why would 1. and 2. be false? Or are they true? HELP!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top