Conservation of Linear Momentum (spring)

AI Thread Summary
A mass 3M collides with a spring system, and the problem involves determining the maximum compression of the spring using conservation of linear momentum and energy principles. The initial momentum is calculated, leading to a final velocity of 3/4 v0 for the combined mass after the collision. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly accounting for kinetic energy at maximum compression, where not all kinetic energy is converted to elastic potential energy. An alternative approach suggests using the center of mass frame to analyze the system's energy dynamics more effectively. The final answer for maximum compression should be x = √(9Mv0²/20k), correcting the initial calculation.
songsteel
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass 3M moving horizontally with velocity v_{0} on a frictionless surface, strikes head-on and sticks to a horizontal spring system of natural length l and spring constant k with masses M at each end. The spring has negligible mass.

Determine the maximum compression of the spring.

Homework Equations



Conservation of Linear Momentum:
Initial Linear Momentum = Final Linear Momentum
Conservation of Energy:
Initial Kinetic Energy + Initial Elastic Potential Energy = Final Kinetic Energy + Final Elastic Potential Energy

The Attempt at a Solution



3Mv_{0} = (3M + M)Vfinal
Vfinal = \frac{3}{4}v_{0}

At Maximum compression: all the Kinetic Energy would have been converted to Elastic Potential Energy; let x be the maximum compression.

\frac{1}{2}(4M)(\frac{3}{4}v_{0})^{2} = \frac{1}{2}(k)(x)^{2}

\frac{9}{8}Mv_{0}^{2} = \frac{kx^{2}}{2}

x = √(\frac{9Mv_{0}^{2}}{4k})

According to the answersheet I was given, the final answer should be x = √(\frac{9Mv_{0}^{2}}{20k}) instead.

Would really appreciate it if anyone could help me out. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your assumption that at max compression KE = 0 has no basis. In fact, it is not compatible with conservation of momentum.
 
I see, would it be correct to write

\frac{1}{2}(4M)(\frac{3}{4}v_{0})^{2} = \frac{1}{2}(k)(x)^{2} + \frac{1}{2}(5M)(V1^{2})

If it is then what method should I use to find v1?
 
The latter equation is meaningless, because 5M is the mass of the entire system, but V1, even if it was the velocity of the center of mass, is not the only contribution to kinetic energy.

Perhaps the easiest approach here would to use the center of mass frame. Find its velocity. Find the kinetic energy of the center of mass. Then, the internal energy in the center of mass frame is the original energy minus the center of mass energy. In the center of mass frame, the system undergoes simple harmonic motion, whose energy is known.
 
I think I got it. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top