Constructing a hall effect transducer

AI Thread Summary
Constructing a Hall effect transducer without p-type semiconductors is challenging due to the reliance on materials like gallium arsenide and indium antimonide in commercial sensors. The Hall effect generates a potential difference across a conductor with current in a magnetic field, but metals have high electron concentrations, resulting in very small Hall voltages that are difficult to detect. Theoretical calculations indicate that achieving a measurable Hall voltage would require significant current and strong magnetic fields, which may not be feasible in practical applications. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding charge carrier density and its impact on Hall voltage. Overall, while theoretically possible, practical implementation without p-type materials poses significant challenges.
tummychow
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to construct a hall effect transducer without the use of p-type semiconductors? I've been looking into the fundamental design of a hall effect sensor, and it generally comprises some amplification/thermal control bits and pieces that all are bound to the most important part, the hall element itself. I'm familiar with all the little bits from other work. But I need the element first.

Commercial hall effect sensors employ elements made out of superthin wafers of p-type semiconductor, from what I've seen. Gallium arsenide and indium antimonide are the norm in the industry (again, from what I've seen). However, I definitely do not have access to these materials.

From a theoretical standpoint, the Hall effect creates a potential difference across any conducting plate that has a current running across it. However, theory often fails to translate into reality. I am seriously in doubt of the idea that I could use any old metal plate, scrub it down, and pipe a current across it to observe the Hall effect (in at least a response of tens of microvolts, which could be amplified with an ultralow offset opamp like an OP07). Is this possible, or (as I suspect) am I spouting impossibilities?

PS: My theoretical knowledge is running a bit short here since I'm not quite sure how to analyze the hall response theoretically (which would let me figure out if building my own hall element was possible), when I don't know how to analyze the charge carrier density theoretically. Wikipedia tells me that the carrier density is usually determined by analysis with the Hall effect >_> not very useful for this problem. Theory of charge carrier density is a question for another time though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The hall voltage is the result of an electric field caused by the deflection of electrons (the current) when a conductor is in a magnetic field.
The force due to the electric field is equal to the force due to the magnetic field.
Analysing this equality give the equation for the HALL VOLTAGE :

Vh = (BxI)/(net)
where B = Magnetic flux density (T)
I = current (A)
n = electron concentration (electrons per m^3)
e = electron charge (1.6 x 10^-19C)
t = thickness of sheet

With metals the electron concentration is high ≈ 10^29 and this means that the Hall voltage is small and therefore difficult to detect.
If you make I = 1A, B= 10T and t =1mm (1 x 10^-3 m) and substitute these you should see that you get about 1μV.
Semiconductors are used in practical Hall effect probes because they can be made with a very small free charge carrier concentration and therefore give a larger Vh
 
First off, thanks for the quoted number on charge carrier density. that helps a lot. I guess I would have to pass through a ton of current to make the effect more visible? I don't think I'm going to be dealing with magnetic fields that strong. (probably on the order of magnitude of 0.00002T or possibly even less)
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top