Continuity of velocity at the interface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the requirement for continuity of fluid particle velocity at an interface during acoustic wave transmission. A discontinuity in velocity would necessitate an impulse to change momentum, which is not available, leading to physical inconsistencies. The participants express frustration over the request for practical examples of velocity discontinuity, emphasizing that such scenarios contradict fundamental principles. The inquiry reflects a curiosity about hypothetical situations where an impulse could create a velocity discontinuity. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of maintaining velocity continuity for accurate modeling in acoustic problems.
SDRK
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear experts,

While solving the wave transmission at an interface for an acoustic wave problem, a boundary condition states that the "velocity of a fluid particle at the surface must be continuous". Could you please let me know why is it required, and a physical insight of what would happen if the velocity was discontinuous at the interface.

Thanks,
Rahul
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A velocity discontinuity at the interface would imply that a particle moving toward the interface would have a sudden change in momentum at the interface. Where is the necessary impulse going to come from? The required impulse is absent, therefore there can be no change in momentum at the interface
 
Thanks Dr.D for your reply. Could you also give me an example (in practical) of a case where there would be a velocity discontinuity at the interface?

Thanks a lot!
 
After I just explain you why it cannot happen, you now ask for a practical example where it does happen. I give up.
 
Dr.D said:
After I just explain you why it cannot happen, you now ask for a practical example where it does happen. I give up.

Oh, I clearly understood the concept you mentioned...However,I was just curious to know if there would be a case of an impulse at the interface to create discontinuity of velocity.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top