Converrgence of oscillating sequence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the convergence of the oscillating sequence defined by c_{n+1} = 1/(1+c_n) with c_1 = 1. The user successfully demonstrated that the differences between consecutive terms alternate in sign. They are seeking assistance in proving that the absolute differences decrease and approach zero, which is essential for establishing convergence. The user has derived that |c_{n+1} - c_n| is less than |c_n - c_{n-1}|, indicating a decreasing trend in absolute differences. The conclusion suggests that these properties imply the sequence is Cauchy, thereby confirming its convergence.
haXadecimal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Convergence of oscillating sequence

Hi, I have to prove that an oscillating sequence converges, I am having some difficulty with the proof.

The sequence is c_{n+1} = \frac{1}{1+c_{n}} , c_{1} = 1

So, I've calculated the first few terms and have seen that the sequence oscillates. I know that I need to prove:
1) The differences alternate in sign.
2) The absolute differences decrease.
3) The absolute differences approach 0.

I have proved 1, using:

<br /> c_{n+1} - c_{n} = \left(\frac{1}{1+c_{n}}\right) - \left(\frac{1}{1+c_{n-1}}\right)<br /> =\frac{1+c_{n-1}-1-c_{n}}{1+c_{n-1}+c_{n}+c_{n-1}c_{n}}<br />
<br /> =\frac{-(c_{n}-c_{n-1})}{1+c_{n-1}+c_{n}=c_{n-1}c_{n}}<br />

And since all terms are positive, the denomenator will be positive and the difference between two terms with alternate in sign from the difference between the previous two terms.

I now am having trouble proving 2 and 3. I'm not exactly sure what to do; the example in my book is not very helpful.So far I have:

<br /> |c_{n+1}-c_{n}| &lt; |c_{n} - c_{n-1}|<br />

but that's not much... If anyone could help, that would be great! Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that:
(1+c_{n})(1+c_{n-1})=2+c_{n-1}
By substituting c_{n}=\frac{1}{1+c_{n-1}}
 
Thank you! Ok, now I have:

<br /> |c_{n+1}-c_{n}| = \frac{|c_{n}-c_{n-1}|}{2+c_{n-1}}<br />

And since all terms are positive, 2+c_{n-1} will be positive, and each absolute difference will be a fraction of the previous absolute difference. Therefore they are decreasing and they will approach 0 as n apporaches infinity. Is that enough to prove this by just saying this? Thanks!

(Is there any way to change the title of the thread? I made a typo :redface: )
 
Technically, I guess you should prove that the gained relations imply that we've got a Cauchy sequence, and hence, that the sequence converges (depends on what you may take as granted)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top