Insights Corrections to MIT Open Courseware: Systems of Varying Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter haruspex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Mit Systems
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights significant concerns regarding the solutions provided in the MIT Open Courseware for the 8-01sc Classical Mechanics course, specifically in the section on applying Newton's Laws to systems of varying mass. The primary issue identified is that while the answers may be correct, the algebraic methods used are flawed, leading to potential confusion for students. A critical flaw noted is the incorrect representation of a system's momentum as a function of time while simultaneously treating it as a function of two variables, which results in contradictory equations. This confusion appears to stem from an improper application of the fundamental equations of motion, particularly the relationship between force, momentum, and mass variation. The reliability of MIT's material is questioned due to these inaccuracies.
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
42,704
Reaction score
10,459
Corrections to
MIT Open Courseware 8-01sc classical mechanics,
fall 2016
Applying Newton’s Laws to systems of Varying Mass
PDF Course Link
My concerns with the solutions provided on the cited MIT Open Courseware web page are, mostly:


Despite arriving at the correct answers, the algebraic methods are invalid. As a result, they can be utterly confusing to the student.
The main flaw, repeated throughout, is writing a system state (momentum) as a function of time only, but effectively defining it as a function of two variables. In some places, this leads to contradictory equations.


This mangled treatment likely results from an attempt to use ##F=\frac {dp}{dt}## in conjunction with ##\frac{dp}{dt}=m\frac{dv}{dt}+\frac{dm}{dt}v##, instead of the...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes bhobba, Delta2, Greg Bernhardt and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a bit concerning. I usually take material from MIT as being pretty much 'gospel' !
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes bhobba and Delta2
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Back
Top