MHB Cos Trig Identity: Deriving Formula for Circuits Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a cosine trigonometric identity for the expression cos(A+B)cos(A+C) relevant to circuit analysis. It is noted that this expression can be transformed into a sum using the identity cos(A+B)cos(A+C) = 1/2 [cos(2A + B + C) + cos(B-C)]. This transformation is crucial for simplifying calculations in circuit analysis. Participants seek clarification on the derivation process and its applications. Understanding this identity can enhance problem-solving in electrical engineering contexts.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Hello. Do you guys know if there is an identity related to this expression

$$\cos(A+B)\cos(A+C)$$

If so, can you help me how to derive it? I need it for the derivation of the formula from my circuits analysis course. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Apparently, you can change it from a product to a sum like this:
$$\cos(A+B) \, \cos(A+C) = \frac12 \left[ \cos(2A + B + C) + \cos(B-C) \right].$$
Does that help?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top