Cosmic microwave background radiation

AI Thread Summary
The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) has a blackbody spectrum with a peak wavelength of 1.06 mm and a frequency of approximately 2.83E11 Hz, confirming it falls within the microwave range. A discussion arose regarding the discrepancy between the calculated wavelength and a provided intensity-frequency curve. It was clarified that the difference arises from the mathematical distinction between wavelength and frequency dependence, leading to different peak positions on the curves. This is not an error but rather a surprising result of how intensity is represented in relation to wavelength versus frequency. Understanding this relationship is crucial for interpreting the CMBR data accurately.
Fabio010
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The cosmic microwave background radiation has a blackbody type spectrum. Determine its max frequency and the correspondent wavelenght. Verify if found frequency is a microwave frequency and compare with the following curve:


Untitled(2).jpg




Homework Equations



Using the Wien Law displacemente, and knowing that CMBR has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.725 K. We can easily calculate the wavelength peak and its frequency.

λmax = 1,06mm

frequency = λmax/c = 2,83E11HZ


We can verify that the frequency that we obtained corresponds to the microwave frequency.

But when i am comparing with this curve
Untitled(2).jpg
, i did not find any relation...

I just do not know what is the relation of the graphic with the obtained results.

Anybody to help? Help is always appreciated.!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a tricky problem.

The curve shows the frequency-dependence of the intensity (waves/cm is proportional to frequency) - you can calculate the wavelength which corresponds to its peak, and it will not agree with your wavelength.

This is not an error on your side, it is a surprising mathematical result: If you switch between wavelength and frequency dependence, you get different positions of the peaks, as "per wavelength" on the y-axis is different from "per frequency".
 
mfb said:
That is a tricky problem.

The curve shows the frequency-dependence of the intensity (waves/cm is proportional to frequency) - you can calculate the wavelength which corresponds to its peak, and it will not agree with your wavelength.

This is not an error on your side, it is a surprising mathematical result: If you switch between wavelength and frequency dependence, you get different positions of the peaks, as "per wavelength" on the y-axis is different from "per frequency".

So, the difference is the switching from wavelength to frequency dependence. The results are "mathematically" equal?
 
The intensity maximum of the wavelength is different from intensity maximum of the frequency - even if the curves correspond to the same spectrum.
 
Understood!

Thanks a lot for the help!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top