Cosmological vs. Relativistic Doppler Shift

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between cosmological redshift and gravitational redshift, emphasizing that the former is a result of the universe's expansion, while the latter pertains to light from isolated gravitating bodies. Participants seek resources to compare observed redshift values with theoretical predictions, specifically focusing on spectral line redshift from stars. It is noted that gravitational redshift has been measured and aligns with General Relativity predictions, contrasting with the cosmological redshift, which is often misrepresented as a speed. The conversation highlights the potential confusion arising from equating gravitational redshift with the Doppler effect. Overall, understanding these differences is crucial for accurate interpretations in astrophysics.
thrush
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know a good read/primer that compares the observed cosmological redshift values to predictions made by the relativistic (gravitational) redshift?

Thank you!
 
Space news on Phys.org
The observed cosmological redshift is not viewed as a "gravitational redshift"; the latter concept applies to light emitted from an isolated gravitating body, which the universe is not.
 
Are you asking for comparision of what is observed and what is predicted by the theory?
 
Sorry I missed the response emails...

The observed cosmological redshift is not viewed as a "gravitational redshift"; the latter concept applies to light emitted from an isolated gravitating body, which the universe is not.

Sounds right, thank you.

Are you asking for comparision of what is observed and what is predicted by the theory?

Thank you, yes. What I am looking for is a primer on the comparison between the estimated spectral line redshift from say, a star:

\frac{\lambda_{r}}{\lambda_{e}}=\frac{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{R_{r}C^{2}}}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{R_{e}C^{2}}}}

and that which is actually measured here on Earth, and how the two differ. It's actually for a citation, so almost anything will do.

THANKS!
 
Last edited:
thrush said:
What I am looking for is a primer on the comparison between the estimated spectral line redshift from say, a star:

Just to confirm, this is not "cosmological redshift". This is ordinary gravitational redshift, and it has been measured in spectral lines from the Sun and from white dwarfs, and the results are in agreement with the GR prediction. See, for example, here:

http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/redshift_white_dwarfs

This article notes that many sources quote gravitational redshifts as a speed, which can cause confusion: this does not mean that the gravitational redshift is due to the Doppler effect. Nor does it mean that gravitational redshift is the same as cosmological redshift, which is also often quoted as a recession speed. Cosmological redshift is due to the expansion of the universe, and the formula for it is quite different from the one you give.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
Back
Top