- #36
Pawel
- 6
- 0
Originally posted by chroot
Sorry, Pawel, but I have to take offense to just about everything you've said here.
Aircraft that fly at high altitudes uses turbines to compress the intake air. See "turboprop" and "turbojet" engines.
Don't be too offended by me taking away some oxygen from some of your idle views. I'm talking about standard jet engines, yes they do compress air by the rotary mechanics, however at the burn rate the oxygen levels are minimal in that altitude. So nonetheless it's impressive to note that air breathing engine that need oxygen do so well at such altitudes.
People who live at altitude are healthier? Do you have any research to support this claim, or is it just speculation?.
common understanding, p.e. knowledge & witness to seeing people in higher altitudes show they are more robust. Tibetans have a good record of lifespan & health in comparison. Like I mentioned before they need to do more work due to geography, air etc. continually excersizing & a cleaner exchange of air. Athletes from higher altitudes also portray much better performance while in lower altitudes as they thrive in richer oxygen as their bodies are adjusted to lower levels 'thin air'.
Go to www.google.com and type in "25000 feet in meters."
9000 m is 27,000 feet. Almost everyone on Earth will die at those kinds of pressure altitudes. Most people need oxygen to survive above 15,000 feet or so.
- Warren
many people have climbed mount everest free of respiratory equipment which reaches close to the altitude u have indicated being almost impossible for a person.