Could Flattened Disks Explain Galaxy Rotation Without Dark Matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores a model of galaxies as stationary, axially symmetric pressure-free fluids in general relativity, proposing that flattened disks of visible matter can explain galaxy rotation without invoking dark matter. The authors demonstrate that the rotation curves of several galaxies, including the Milky Way, align with mass density distributions from visible matter. This model suggests that a massive halo of dark matter is unnecessary, with a determined luminous mass density threshold of 10^{-21.75} kg.m$^{-3}. The findings challenge conventional dark matter theories and invite further examination of galaxy dynamics. The implications of this research could significantly alter our understanding of cosmic structure.
ek
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Authors: F. I. Cooperstock, S. Tieu

A galaxy is modeled as a stationary axially symmetric pressure-free fluid in general relativity. For the weak gravitational fields under consideration, the field equations and the equations of motion ultimately lead to one linear and one nonlinear equation relating the angular velocity to the fluid density. It is shown that the rotation curves for the Milky Way, NGC 3031, NGC 3198 and NGC 7331 are consistent with the mass density distributions of the visible matter concentrated in flattened disks. Thus the need for a massive halo of exotic dark matter is removed. For these galaxies we determine the mass density for the luminous threshold as 10^{-21.75} kg.m$^{-3}.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0507619

It's authoured by a cosmologist at my school. It's a little heady for me but I thought some here could take something from it and its very important conclusion, so I thought I'd share it.

Thoughts? Total BS? Maybe onto something?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top