- #1
paulharter
- 5
- 1
This has been bothering me for ages so I'm posting here in the hope someone can answer.
If the universe was not expanding and if time was not constant but instead was speeding up why would this not fully account for observed cosmological redshift? Wavelengths of light released long ago would appear longer as seconds are shorter than when the light started its journey.
And I guess no Big Bang or dark matter.
If the universe was not expanding and if time was not constant but instead was speeding up why would this not fully account for observed cosmological redshift? Wavelengths of light released long ago would appear longer as seconds are shorter than when the light started its journey.
And I guess no Big Bang or dark matter.