Could There Be Distances Beyond Planck Length in Discrete Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter qsa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete Space
qsa
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
Discrete space has been proposed at Planck length. But has any other distance been proposed(studied), like near proton width.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Discrete space time means that energy and momentum are only conserved modulo the inverse lattice spacing.
 
Count Iblis said:
Discrete space time means that energy and momentum are only conserved modulo the inverse lattice spacing.

Yes, but my question was about if anybody tried or thought that the Planck length might not be the only length possible. Since, as Susskind puts it the desert from TeV to 10^19 GeV. Of course, I know the rarional for Planck length case.
 

Thread 'The Power of QM and QFT'

We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
View full post »

Thread 'Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment'

I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Similar threads

I Are time and space continuous or discrete?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Chunks of action smaller than Planck's constant
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Is the Planck length the smallest measurable length?
Replies
9
Views
3K
B Why did Max Planck assume discrete energy values?
Replies
22
Views
5K
B Planck Length 1 Detector? Emitter?
Replies
35
Views
3K
I Necessity of Quantum Gravity given Planck scales for nuclear physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Classical Mechanics: Continuous or Discrete universe
Replies
12
Views
3K
I Does String Theory Justifiably Extend Gravitational Laws to Sub-Planck Lengths?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Could Planck have used different energy-frequency relation?
Replies
2
Views
2K
(Control) Derivative filter and discrete model
Replies
0
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top