Coulomb force on a line charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the Coulomb force exerted by a uniformly charged sphere on a line charge along the Z-axis. The source charge is modeled as a point charge derived from the sphere's uniform charge density, while the line charge is represented by its total charge. The user initially struggled with expressing the vector from the source charge to the line charge but eventually simplified the problem by choosing a straightforward vector representation. After integrating the force expression from the starting point to the endpoint of the line charge, the user confirmed that their final answer matched the solution in the textbook. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly defining vectors when dealing with continuous charge distributions.
Kudaros
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have a source charge that is a uniform sphere with a radius a (centered at origin) and uniform charge density, \rho. There is a line charge with a length L that begins at Z0 and ends at Z0 + L (lies on the Z axis). This line charge has a uniform charge density of \lambda.

Homework Equations



Ill combine this with my attempt.

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I am resolving the source charge as a point. The sphere is of a uniform charge density and centered on the origin. So the 'q' for this source charge is \frac{4}{3}\pi*a2*\rho.

Second, I am calling the line charge L*\lambda.

My solution so far : Fq'onq(sphere/point on line charge)= \frac{\lambda*\rho*a^{3}*L}{3*\epsilon}*\frac{\vec{R}}{R^{3}}
My problem (assuming the above is correct) is that I am uncertain how to express the vector, R, from the source charge to the line charge.

In general, I am unsure of how to express a vector from a point to a continuous distribution of charges, or even from a continuous distribution to another.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can treat the line charge as a point charge, as you can do with spheres.
 
Ok I've got it.My line charge was indeed wrong.

Basically, I chose my vector to be simple. The position with respect to the source was Z*Z(hat) and I ended up integrating from Z0 to Z0+L with 1/Z2 as the integrand ( lambda is constant, was pulled out.)

Some quick simplification results in the answer in the back of the book.

I was thinking too hard about the vector I suppose.

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top