Covariant derivative of a vector field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the covariant derivative of a vector field, specifically \nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a), equals the partial derivative \partial_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a). The participant initially struggles with the calculations involving the covariant derivative and the connection terms. After identifying a mistake in the equation for the connection coefficients, they correct it and successfully derive the desired equality. The final conclusion confirms that the connection term drops out, leading to the equality being satisfied. The resolution highlights the importance of accurate equations in tensor calculus.
physicus
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that \nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)=\partial_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)
where h is the metric and S^a a vector.


Homework Equations


\nabla_a V^b = \partial_a V^b+\Gamma^b_{ac}V^c
\Gamma^a_{ab} = \frac{1}{2det\;h}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}
\nabla_a\sqrt{-det\;h} (is that right??) since \nabla_a h


The Attempt at a Solution


I can't quite figure out how to get the result:
\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)
=\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h})S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\nabla_a(S^a)
=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\Gamma^a_{ab}S^b
=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\frac{1}{2det\;h}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}S^b
=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\frac{1}{2\sqrt{-det\;h}}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}S^b
=\ldots
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd be interested to find out if someone figures out what's going on here, because to me, it does seem unusual that the connection term must drop out for this to work.
 
Are you sure you have the right equations? I'm not entirely sure, but I don't think there should be square root in the second relevant equation. Also I think the problem would make more sense if one of the square roots was outside the derivative on one of the sides of the original equation.
 
Thank you very much for you help! You are right. There is a mistake in my second relevant equation. It should be: \Gamma^a_{ab} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{det\;h}}\partial_b\sqrt{det\;h}

Then I get:
\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h}S^a)
=\nabla_a(\sqrt{-det\;h})S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\nabla_a(S^a)
=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\Gamma^a_{ab}S^b
= \sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\sqrt{-det\;h}\frac{1}{\sqrt{det\;h}}\partial_b \sqrt{det\;h}\;S^b
=\sqrt{-det\;h}\;\partial_a S^a+\partial_b\sqrt{-det\;h}\;S^b
=\partial_a (\sqrt{-det\;h}\;S^a)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top